public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
To: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: Bart Van Assche <Bart.VanAssche@wdc.com>,
	dm-devel@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Alasdair Kergon <agk@redhat.com>,
	linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org
Subject: Re: dm: enable opt-out of device-mapper dax support
Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2017 15:02:57 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170801190257.GA10033@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <150161113411.34055.9762658795237184307.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com>

On Tue, Aug 01 2017 at  2:12pm -0400,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> wrote:

> Now that dax is no longer a default property of a block-device, i.e.
> ->direct_access() is not a block-device operation, we optionally enable
> device-mapper dax support with a new CONFIG_DM_DAX option.
> 
> All the dax operations helpers are moved to a new file,
> drivers/md/dm-dax.c, that is optionally compiled when CONFIG_DM_DAX=y.
> Otherwise, we stub out all the operations with NULL function pointers
> and nop wrappers for the core dax routines.
> 
> Cc: Alasdair Kergon <agk@redhat.com>
> Cc: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
> Reported-by: Bart Van Assche <Bart.VanAssche@wdc.com>
> Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/md/Kconfig     |   14 +++
>  drivers/md/Makefile    |    1 
>  drivers/md/dm-dax.c    |  227 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  drivers/md/dm-dax.h    |   73 +++++++++++++++
>  drivers/md/dm-linear.c |   56 ------------
>  drivers/md/dm-snap.c   |    9 --
>  drivers/md/dm-stripe.c |   89 -------------------
>  drivers/md/dm-target.c |    7 -
>  drivers/md/dm.c        |  105 ++--------------------
>  drivers/md/dm.h        |   34 +++++++
>  10 files changed, 363 insertions(+), 252 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 drivers/md/dm-dax.c
>  create mode 100644 drivers/md/dm-dax.h
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/md/Kconfig b/drivers/md/Kconfig
> index 4a249ee86364..bf27b435f7cd 100644
> --- a/drivers/md/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/md/Kconfig
> @@ -200,7 +200,6 @@ config BLK_DEV_DM_BUILTIN
>  config BLK_DEV_DM
>  	tristate "Device mapper support"
>  	select BLK_DEV_DM_BUILTIN
> -	select DAX
>  	---help---
>  	  Device-mapper is a low level volume manager.  It works by allowing
>  	  people to specify mappings for ranges of logical sectors.  Various
> @@ -214,6 +213,19 @@ config BLK_DEV_DM
>  
>  	  If unsure, say N.
>  
> +config DM_DAX
> +	bool "Direct access (DAX) support"
> +	depends on BLK_DEV_DM
> +	default BLK_DEV_PMEM
> +	select DAX
> +	---help---
> +	  Enable DAX support for the device-mapper linear and stripe
> +	  targets for use with DAX capable block devices like /dev/pmemN.
> +	  If you have a DAX capable block device and have enabled
> +	  filesystem DAX support (CONFIG_FS_DAX), then say Y.
> +
> +	  If unsure, say N.
> +

I'm questioning the need to have yet another Kbuild CONFIG option.  If
the user has enabled CONFIG_BLK_DEV_PMEM and CONFIG_FS_DAX (DAX already
gets selected by CONFIG_FS_DAX) then shouldn't the DM capabilities just
be enabled?

Guess I'm just skeptical of: why do we want to move to a model where
users need to opt-in to DM support for DAX?

I also _really_ don't like each target's DAX support being colocated in
drivers/md/dm-dax.c

This all looks and feels like a serious step backwards.

Mike

  reply	other threads:[~2017-08-01 19:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-08-01 18:12 [PATCH] dm: enable opt-out of device-mapper dax support Dan Williams
2017-08-01 19:02 ` Mike Snitzer [this message]
2017-08-01 19:45   ` Dan Williams
2017-08-01 20:59     ` Dan Williams
2017-08-01 21:04       ` Bart Van Assche
2017-08-01 21:19         ` Dan Williams
2017-08-01 22:47 ` [PATCH v2] dm: allow device-mapper to operate without " Dan Williams
2017-08-02 16:02   ` kbuild test robot
2017-08-02 20:44   ` kbuild test robot
2017-08-02  1:40 ` [PATCH] dm: enable opt-out of device-mapper " kbuild test robot
2017-08-02  1:48 ` kbuild test robot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170801190257.GA10033@redhat.com \
    --to=snitzer@redhat.com \
    --cc=Bart.VanAssche@wdc.com \
    --cc=agk@redhat.com \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox