From: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
To: Thomas Huth <huth@tuxfamily.org>
Cc: sohu0106 <sohu0106@126.com>,
schwidefsky@de.ibm.com, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: drivers/s390/char/keyboard.c kernel stack infoleak
Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2017 11:20:17 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170804092017.GA3278@osiris> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0b76e8f9-e1ea-da9e-23f2-92cdbd475ec9@tuxfamily.org>
On Fri, Aug 04, 2017 at 11:09:24AM +0200, Thomas Huth wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 03.08.2017 15:59, sohu0106 wrote:
> >
> > The stack object "kbdiacr" has a total size of 4 bytes. Its last 1 bytes are padding bytes after "result" which are not initialized and leaked to userland via "copy_to_user".
> >
> >
> > diff --git a/keyboard.c b/keyboard.c
> > index ba0e4f9..76a6d35 100644
> > --- a/keyboard.c
> > +++ b/keyboard.c
> > @@ -480,6 +480,8 @@ int kbd_ioctl(struct kbd_data *kbd, unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg)
> > struct kbdiacr diacr;
> > int i;
> >
> > + memset( &diacr, 0, sizeof(struct kbdiacr) );
> > +
>
> I think it would be nicer to simply init the struct with "= {}"
> directly, i.e.:
>
> struct kbdiacr diacr = {};
>
> And by the way, please have a look at the kernel patch submission
> guidelines first, especially the COO part here:
The patch doesn't make sense. There is no padding and therefore no
information leak.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-08-04 9:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-08-03 13:59 drivers/s390/char/keyboard.c kernel stack infoleak sohu0106
2017-08-04 9:09 ` Thomas Huth
2017-08-04 9:20 ` Heiko Carstens [this message]
[not found] ` <78655e6a.d34.15db01cd5b8.Coremail.sohu0106@126.com>
2017-08-05 7:12 ` Thomas Huth
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170804092017.GA3278@osiris \
--to=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
--cc=huth@tuxfamily.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
--cc=sohu0106@126.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox