linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Pali Rohár" <pali.rohar@gmail.com>
To: Darren Hart <dvhart@infradead.org>, Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andy@infradead.org>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
	platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] RFC: platform/x86: wmi: Fix check for method instance number
Date: Sun, 6 Aug 2017 17:42:56 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <201708061742.57031@pali> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170614154654.GA22981@pali>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: Text/Plain, Size: 2644 bytes --]

On Wednesday 14 June 2017 17:46:54 Pali Rohár wrote:
> On Tuesday 13 June 2017 11:42:28 Darren Hart wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 08:04:57PM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > > On Tuesday 13 June 2017 18:49:51 Darren Hart wrote:
> > > > I'd suggest reaching out to the maintainers and contributors to
> > > > the drivers you mention to request some help in testing.
> > > 
> > > Seems sane. Grep for all methods with instance number different
> > > as zero (or just number one -- which can be suspicious as
> > > somebody could thought that indexing is from one, not zer) and
> > > try to receive ACPI/BMOF data and verify it.
> > 
> > This would still be the ideal solution, verify we can do the right
> > thing without breaking existing drivers. Agreed.
> 
> Here is all usage:
> 
> Function wmi_set_block:
> 
>   msi-wmi.c:
>   instance=0 /* Instance 0 is "set backlight" */
> 
>   tc1100-wmi.c:
>   instance=TC1100_INSTANCE_WIRELESS /* defined as 1 */
>   instance=TC1100_INSTANCE_JOGDIAL  /* defined as 2 */
> 
> Function wmi_query_block:
> 
>   acer-wmi.c:
>   instance=1 /* no comment why,
> guid=95764E09-FB56-4E83-B31A-37761F60994A */
> 
>   dell-wmi.c:
>   instance=0
> 
>   msi-wmi.c:
>   instance=1 /* Instance 1 is "get backlight", cmp with DSDT */
> 
>   surface3-wmi.c:
>   instance=0
> 
>   tc1100-wmi.c:
>   (same as in wmi_set_block)
> 
> Function wmi_evaluate_method:
> 
>   acer-wmi.c:
>   instance=1 /* no comment why,
> guid=67C3371D-95A3-4C37-BB61-DD47B491DAAB */ instance=1 /* no
> comment why, guid=6AF4F258-B401-42FD-BE91-3D4AC2D7C0D3 */ instance=0
> 
>   alienware-wmi.c:
>   instance=1 /* no comment why,
> guid=A70591CE-A997-11DA-B012-B622A1EF5492 */ instance=1 /* no
> comment why, guid=A80593CE-A997-11DA-B012-B622A1EF5492 */ instance=1
> /* no comment why, guid=A70591CE-A997-11DA-B012-B622A1EF5492 */
> 
>   asus-wmi.c:
>   instance=1 /* no comment why,
> guid=97845ED0-4E6D-11DE-8A39-0800200C9A66 */
> 
>   dell-wmi-led.c:
>   instance=1 /* no comment why,
> guid=F6E4FE6E-909D-47cb-8BAB-C9F6F2F8D396 */
> 
>   hp-wmi.c:
>   instance=0
> 
>   mxm-wmi.c:
>   instance=1 /* no comment why,
> guid=F6CB5C3C-9CAE-4EBD-B577-931EA32A2CC0 */
> 
> So problematic drivers which use instance=1 without any comments are:
> 
>   acer-wmi
>   alienware-wmi
>   asus-wmi
>   dell-wmi-led
>   mxm-wmi

Also there is a new problematic driver named peaq-wmi.c added by Hans. 
Adding into loop. Hans, can you recheck if arguments for 
wmi_evaluate_method() are correct, specially instance number "1"?

-- 
Pali Rohár
pali.rohar@gmail.com

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]

  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-08-06 15:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-05-27 11:55 [PATCH] RFC: platform/x86: wmi: Fix check for method instance number Pali Rohár
2017-06-10 19:15 ` Pali Rohár
2017-06-13 16:49   ` Darren Hart
2017-06-13 18:04     ` Pali Rohár
2017-06-13 18:42       ` Darren Hart
2017-06-14 15:46         ` Pali Rohár
2017-06-14 20:39           ` Darren Hart
2017-06-15 13:59           ` Pali Rohár
2017-06-15 15:16             ` Mario.Limonciello
2017-06-16 16:33             ` Mario.Limonciello
2017-06-17 16:34               ` Pali Rohár
2017-06-21 21:52                 ` Mario.Limonciello
2017-06-22  7:33                   ` Pali Rohár
2017-06-17 16:47           ` Pali Rohár
2017-06-19 15:02             ` joeyli
2017-07-05  9:51             ` Pali Rohár
2017-07-05 19:30               ` David Airlie
2017-07-05 20:24                 ` Pali Rohár
2017-08-06 15:35                   ` Pali Rohár
2017-08-06 16:10                     ` Andy Shevchenko
2017-08-06 20:21                       ` Pali Rohár
2017-08-06 15:42           ` Pali Rohár [this message]
2017-08-06 16:18             ` Hans de Goede
2017-08-06 20:16               ` Pali Rohár

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=201708061742.57031@pali \
    --to=pali.rohar@gmail.com \
    --cc=andy@infradead.org \
    --cc=dvhart@infradead.org \
    --cc=hdegoede@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).