From: Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>
To: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>
Cc: rjw@rjwysocki.net, lenb@kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
mario.limonciello@dell.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ACPI / Sleep: Check low power idle constraints for debug only
Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2017 09:51:20 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170808075120.GA9258@wunner.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1502150037-32786-1-git-send-email-srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>
On Mon, Aug 07, 2017 at 04:53:57PM -0700, Srinivas Pandruvada wrote:
> + out_obj = acpi_evaluate_dsm(lps0_device_handle, &lps0_dsm_guid,
> + 1, ACPI_LPS0_GET_DEVICE_CONSTRAINTS,
> + NULL);
> +
> + acpi_handle_debug(lps0_device_handle, "_DSM function 1 eval %s\n",
> + out_obj ? "successful" : "failed");
> +
> + if (!out_obj)
> + return;
> +
> + if (out_obj->type != ACPI_TYPE_PACKAGE)
> + goto free_acpi_buffer;
Using acpi_evaluate_dsm_typed() would avoid having to check the type here.
> + for (i = 0; i < out_obj->package.count; i++) {
> + union acpi_object *package = &out_obj->package.elements[i];
> + struct lpi_device_info info;
> + int package_count = 0, j;
> +
> + if (!package)
> + continue;
> +
> + info.enabled = 0;
> + info.package = NULL;
> + info.name = NULL;
Using a declaration such as
struct lpi_device_info info = { };
would avoid having to zero the struct elements here.
Thanks,
Lukas
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-08-08 7:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-08-07 23:53 [PATCH] ACPI / Sleep: Check low power idle constraints for debug only Srinivas Pandruvada
2017-08-08 7:51 ` Lukas Wunner [this message]
2017-08-08 16:08 ` Srinivas Pandruvada
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170808075120.GA9258@wunner.de \
--to=lukas@wunner.de \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mario.limonciello@dell.com \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox