From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752979AbdHJR2x (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Aug 2017 13:28:53 -0400 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.101.70]:36128 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752524AbdHJR2v (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Aug 2017 13:28:51 -0400 Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2017 18:28:54 +0100 From: Will Deacon To: Rob Clark Cc: iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, Archit Taneja , Rob Herring , Sricharan , Mark Rutland , Robin Murphy , Joerg Roedel , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH 2/4] iommu: arm-smmu: split out register defines Message-ID: <20170810172853.GE9980@arm.com> References: <20170809144310.22855-1-robdclark@gmail.com> <20170809144310.22855-3-robdclark@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170809144310.22855-3-robdclark@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Aug 09, 2017 at 10:43:03AM -0400, Rob Clark wrote: > I want to re-use some of these for qcom_iommu, which has (roughly) the > same context-bank registers. > > Signed-off-by: Rob Clark > --- > drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-regs.h | 220 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c | 211 ++-------------------------------------- > 2 files changed, 229 insertions(+), 202 deletions(-) > create mode 100644 drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-regs.h This looks like a reasonable split, thanks: Acked-by: Will Deacon Will