From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752570AbdHPSwr (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Aug 2017 14:52:47 -0400 Received: from mail-qk0-f195.google.com ([209.85.220.195]:33298 "EHLO mail-qk0-f195.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752339AbdHPSwp (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Aug 2017 14:52:45 -0400 Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2017 11:52:41 -0700 From: Tejun Heo To: lizefan@huawei.com, hannes@cmpxchg.org, peterz@infradead.org, mingo@redhat.com, longman@redhat.com Cc: cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@fb.com, pjt@google.com, luto@amacapital.net, efault@gmx.de, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, guro@fb.com Subject: Re: [PATCHSET for-4.14] cgroup, sched: cgroup2 basic resource accounting Message-ID: <20170816185241.GF4087514@devbig577.frc2.facebook.com> References: <20170811163754.3939102-1-tj@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170811163754.3939102-1-tj@kernel.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hello, On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 09:37:51AM -0700, Tejun Heo wrote: > This patchset implement cgroup2 basic resource accounting and track > CPU usages on all cgroups by default. Ping. I've renamed as Waiman suggested. If there's no further objection, how should we route these patches and the following cpu cgroup2 interface patch? Thanks. -- tejun