From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1751644AbdHQJsS (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Thu, 17 Aug 2017 05:48:18 -0400
Received: from mga11.intel.com ([192.55.52.93]:46078 "EHLO mga11.intel.com"
        rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
        id S1750857AbdHQJsQ (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Thu, 17 Aug 2017 05:48:16 -0400
X-ExtLoop1: 1
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.41,387,1498546800"; 
   d="scan'208";a="890984647"
Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2017 12:39:28 +0300
From: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>,
        Colin King <colin.king@canonical.com>,
        Andreas Noever <andreas.noever@gmail.com>,
        Michael Jamet <michael.jamet@intel.com>,
        Yehezkel Bernat <yehezkel.bernat@intel.com>,
        kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] thunderbolt: fix incorrect value assigned to
 req->response_type
Message-ID: <20170817093928.GF2327@lahna.fi.intel.com>
References: <20170815143133.26500-1-colin.king@canonical.com>
 <20170815143834.GL2369@lahna.fi.intel.com>
 <20170815152259.idjvtw5tdg24xj2o@mwanda>
 <20170816081001.GP2369@lahna.fi.intel.com>
 <20170816161327.GB3550@kroah.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20170816161327.GB3550@kroah.com>
Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo
User-Agent: Mutt/1.8.3 (2017-05-23)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 09:13:27AM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 11:10:01AM +0300, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 06:22:59PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> > > On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 05:38:34PM +0300, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 03:31:33PM +0100, Colin King wrote:
> > > > > From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
> > > > > 
> > > > > req->response_type is being assigned the sizeof TB_CFG_PKG_RESET
> > > > > and should actually be assigned TB_CFG_PKG_RESET. Fix this.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
> > > > 
> > > > IIRC I already acked this some time ago ;-)
> > > > 
> > > > Acked-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
> > > > 
> > > > BTW, you should CC Greg as he has been gathering Thunderbolt related
> > > > patches. I added him now.
> > > 
> > > Yeah.  I sent this patch on Jun 14.  "[PATCH] thunderbolt: Fix reset
> > > response_type"  I didn't CC Greg, either.  Someone should probably
> > > update MAINTAINERS if Greg needs to get these emails.
> > 
> > Indeed.
> > 
> > Greg, Andreas,
> > 
> > Should we add Greg to the MAINTAINERS so that he will be getting all the
> > thunderbolt related patches? Another way, if we want to make this easier
> > for Greg, is to establish a thunderbolt tree in kernel.org and send pull
> > requests to him directly.
> 
> The "maintainers" of thunderbolt should either be forwarding on patches
> to me to accept, or to give me a git tree to pull, or to ack patches
> that I am cc:ed on.  Whichever works best for them, but in all cases, I
> am not the maintainer of the thunderbolt subsystem, so I don't need to
> be listed under MAINTAINERS.

OK, thanks for the clarification :)