From: "Radim Krčmář" <rkrcmar@redhat.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kvm: x86: disable KVM_FAST_MMIO_BUS
Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2017 15:23:55 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170817132354.GB2566@flask> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2f80e82b-3007-0348-72b8-3391c7c57589@redhat.com>
2017-08-17 14:14+0200, Paolo Bonzini:
> On 17/08/2017 11:00, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> > On 17/08/2017 00:31, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> >> On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 11:25:35PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> >>> Yes, I agree. EMULTYPE_SKIP is fine because failed decoding still
> >>> causes an exception to be injected. Maybe it's better to gate the
> >>> EMULTYPE_SKIP emulation on the exit qualification saying this is a write
> >>
> >> I thought it's already limited to writes. I agree that's a reasonable
> >> limitation in any case.
> >>
> >>> and also not a page table walk---just in case.
> >>
> >> I still don't get it, sorry. Let's assume for the sake of argument
> >> that it's a PT walk causing the MMIO access. Just why do you think
> >> that it makes sense to skip the instruction that caused the walk?
> >
> > I think it doesn't. I think in that case it's better to skip the fast
> > write and proceed with full emulation.
It definitely doesn't. I think it's possible only because virtio
forbids other access types, so we assume that every access is a write
access.
> ... nope, exit qualification is just zero for EPT misconfigurations, so
> we cannot do this.
Yeah, we'd need to use EPT violation to get that information.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-08-17 13:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-08-16 11:22 [PATCH] kvm: x86: disable KVM_FAST_MMIO_BUS Paolo Bonzini
2017-08-16 12:07 ` Radim Krčmář
2017-08-16 13:37 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-08-16 14:06 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2017-08-16 14:17 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-08-17 8:15 ` David Hildenbrand
2017-08-16 12:58 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2017-08-16 13:05 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-08-16 13:16 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2017-08-16 13:30 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-08-16 14:03 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2017-08-16 16:50 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2017-08-16 17:19 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-08-16 19:03 ` Radim Krčmář
2017-08-16 19:59 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2017-08-16 21:25 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-08-16 22:31 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2017-08-17 9:00 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-08-17 12:14 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-08-17 13:23 ` Radim Krčmář [this message]
2017-08-17 15:15 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2017-08-17 13:51 ` Radim Krčmář
2017-08-17 15:27 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2017-08-16 19:47 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170817132354.GB2566@flask \
--to=rkrcmar@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox