public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Pali Rohár" <pali.rohar@gmail.com>
To: Darren Hart <dvhart@infradead.org>
Cc: Corentin Chary <corentin.chary@gmail.com>,
	Andy Shevchenko <andy@infradead.org>,
	acpi4asus-user@lists.sourceforge.net,
	platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] platform/x86: wmi: Fix check for method instance number
Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2017 23:13:19 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170817211319.GA20526@pali> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170817152431.GA19276@fury>

On Thursday 17 August 2017 08:24:31 Darren Hart wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 12, 2017 at 09:44:18AM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > instance_count defines number of instances of data block and instance
> > itself is indexed from zero, which means first instance has number 0.
> > Therefore check for invalid instance should be non-strict inequality.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Pali Rohár <pali.rohar@gmail.com>
> 
> This is correct per the WMI specification. Pali, now that Andy has
> applied 1-3 of this series, is that all the required driver updates?

Hmmm... I have not understood your question.

I checked that all drivers which uses instance id 1 have comment
explaining why is id 1 used.

Problematic drivers without comment have either patch to use instance id
0 in this series or somebody else already supplied patch which is part
of linus tree.

> Reviewed-by: Darren Hart (VMware) <dvhart@infradead.org>
> 
> 
> > ---
> >  drivers/platform/x86/wmi.c |    6 +++---
> >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/wmi.c b/drivers/platform/x86/wmi.c
> > index e32ba57..0765b17 100644
> > --- a/drivers/platform/x86/wmi.c
> > +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/wmi.c
> > @@ -218,7 +218,7 @@ acpi_status wmi_evaluate_method(const char *guid_string, u8 instance,
> >  	if (!(block->flags & ACPI_WMI_METHOD))
> >  		return AE_BAD_DATA;
> >  
> > -	if (block->instance_count < instance)
> > +	if (block->instance_count <= instance)
> >  		return AE_BAD_PARAMETER;
> >  
> >  	input.count = 2;
> > @@ -265,7 +265,7 @@ static acpi_status __query_block(struct wmi_block *wblock, u8 instance,
> >  	block = &wblock->gblock;
> >  	handle = wblock->acpi_device->handle;
> >  
> > -	if (block->instance_count < instance)
> > +	if (block->instance_count <= instance)
> >  		return AE_BAD_PARAMETER;
> >  
> >  	/* Check GUID is a data block */
> > @@ -392,7 +392,7 @@ acpi_status wmi_set_block(const char *guid_string, u8 instance,
> >  	block = &wblock->gblock;
> >  	handle = wblock->acpi_device->handle;
> >  
> > -	if (block->instance_count < instance)
> > +	if (block->instance_count <= instance)
> >  		return AE_BAD_PARAMETER;
> >  
> >  	/* Check GUID is a data block */
> > -- 
> > 1.7.9.5
> > 
> > 
> 

-- 
Pali Rohár
pali.rohar@gmail.com

  reply	other threads:[~2017-08-17 21:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-08-12  7:44 [PATCH 0/4] platform/x86: Fix check for method instance number Pali Rohár
2017-08-12  7:44 ` [PATCH 1/4] platform/x86: mxm-wmi: Evaluate wmi method with instance number 0x0 Pali Rohár
2017-08-12  7:44 ` [PATCH 2/4] platform/x86: asus-wmi: " Pali Rohár
2017-08-12  7:44 ` [PATCH 3/4] platform/x86: peaq-wmi: " Pali Rohár
2017-08-12 20:12   ` Hans de Goede
2017-08-12  7:44 ` [PATCH 4/4] platform/x86: wmi: Fix check for method instance number Pali Rohár
2017-08-17 15:24   ` Darren Hart
2017-08-17 21:13     ` Pali Rohár [this message]
2017-08-17 21:36       ` Darren Hart
2017-08-18 12:20     ` Andy Shevchenko
2017-08-13 12:54 ` [PATCH 0/4] platform/x86: " Andy Shevchenko
2017-08-17 15:25   ` Darren Hart
2017-08-17 17:31     ` Andy Shevchenko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170817211319.GA20526@pali \
    --to=pali.rohar@gmail.com \
    --cc=acpi4asus-user@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=andy@infradead.org \
    --cc=corentin.chary@gmail.com \
    --cc=dvhart@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox