From: Darren Hart <dvhart@infradead.org>
To: "Pali Rohár" <pali.rohar@gmail.com>
Cc: Corentin Chary <corentin.chary@gmail.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy@infradead.org>,
acpi4asus-user@lists.sourceforge.net,
platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] platform/x86: wmi: Fix check for method instance number
Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2017 14:36:02 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170817213602.GC19276@fury> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170817211319.GA20526@pali>
On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 11:13:19PM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
> On Thursday 17 August 2017 08:24:31 Darren Hart wrote:
> > On Sat, Aug 12, 2017 at 09:44:18AM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > > instance_count defines number of instances of data block and instance
> > > itself is indexed from zero, which means first instance has number 0.
> > > Therefore check for invalid instance should be non-strict inequality.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Pali Rohár <pali.rohar@gmail.com>
> >
> > This is correct per the WMI specification. Pali, now that Andy has
> > applied 1-3 of this series, is that all the required driver updates?
>
> Hmmm... I have not understood your question.
>
> I checked that all drivers which uses instance id 1 have comment
> explaining why is id 1 used.
>
> Problematic drivers without comment have either patch to use instance id
> 0 in this series or somebody else already supplied patch which is part
> of linus tree.
Perfect, that is what I was looking for. Thanks Pali!
>
> > Reviewed-by: Darren Hart (VMware) <dvhart@infradead.org>
--
Darren Hart
VMware Open Source Technology Center
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-08-17 21:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-08-12 7:44 [PATCH 0/4] platform/x86: Fix check for method instance number Pali Rohár
2017-08-12 7:44 ` [PATCH 1/4] platform/x86: mxm-wmi: Evaluate wmi method with instance number 0x0 Pali Rohár
2017-08-12 7:44 ` [PATCH 2/4] platform/x86: asus-wmi: " Pali Rohár
2017-08-12 7:44 ` [PATCH 3/4] platform/x86: peaq-wmi: " Pali Rohár
2017-08-12 20:12 ` Hans de Goede
2017-08-12 7:44 ` [PATCH 4/4] platform/x86: wmi: Fix check for method instance number Pali Rohár
2017-08-17 15:24 ` Darren Hart
2017-08-17 21:13 ` Pali Rohár
2017-08-17 21:36 ` Darren Hart [this message]
2017-08-18 12:20 ` Andy Shevchenko
2017-08-13 12:54 ` [PATCH 0/4] platform/x86: " Andy Shevchenko
2017-08-17 15:25 ` Darren Hart
2017-08-17 17:31 ` Andy Shevchenko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170817213602.GC19276@fury \
--to=dvhart@infradead.org \
--cc=acpi4asus-user@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=andy@infradead.org \
--cc=corentin.chary@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pali.rohar@gmail.com \
--cc=platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox