From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752013AbdHRILe (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Aug 2017 04:11:34 -0400 Received: from mail-yw0-f181.google.com ([209.85.161.181]:34400 "EHLO mail-yw0-f181.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750929AbdHRILb (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Aug 2017 04:11:31 -0400 Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2017 01:11:27 -0700 From: Omar Sandoval To: James Wang Cc: osandov@fb.com, hch@infradead.org, axboe@fb.com, hare@suse.com, linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mgorman@suse.com Subject: Re: [PATCH blktests v2] loop/002: Regression testing for loop device flush Message-ID: <20170818081127.GJ2459@vader> References: <20170627040147.8823-1-jnwang@suse.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170627040147.8823-1-jnwang@suse.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.8.3 (2017-05-23) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 12:01:47PM +0800, James Wang wrote: > Add a regression testing for loop device. when an unbound device > be close that take too long time. kernel will consume serveral orders > of magnitude more wall time than it does for a mounted device. James, sorry I forgot about this. I ended up committing a simplified version here: https://github.com/osandov/blktests/commit/bbe69c4cc83ddc36e5c82114890ac071d01c8ac5 Thanks for the test!