From: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@gmail.com>
To: Vallish Vaidyeshwara <vallish@amazon.com>
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, shuah@kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, eduval@amazon.com,
anchalag@amazon.com, tglx@linutronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND 0/2] enable hires timer to timeout datagram socket
Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2017 22:18:54 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170818201854.xes246oviptinwvq@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1503081850-10671-1-git-send-email-vallish@amazon.com>
On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 06:44:08PM +0000, Vallish Vaidyeshwara wrote:
> There has been a behavior change in 4.9 kernel with refactoring of Kernel
> timer wheel in 4.8. We have a use case wherein our datagram socket
> application is sensitive to socket timeout including long timeouts.
>
> One of the test runs with a timeout value of 180 seconds timed out at
> 190 seconds.
So the whole premise of the new timer wheel is that long timeouts need
not be very accurate.
> Patch 1: Has core code change of enabling hires timer to timeout datagram
> socket on AF_UNIX and AF_INET domain
Using hrtimers will hurt performance for most applications. Can you
please explain your use case and why is it so important?
Thanks,
Richard
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-08-18 20:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-08-18 18:44 [PATCH RESEND 0/2] enable hires timer to timeout datagram socket Vallish Vaidyeshwara
2017-08-18 18:44 ` [PATCH RESEND 1/2] net: enable high resolution timer mode to timeout datagram sockets Vallish Vaidyeshwara
2017-08-21 20:10 ` Cong Wang
2017-08-22 11:14 ` Vallish Vaidyeshwara
2017-08-18 18:44 ` [PATCH RESEND 2/2] selftests/net: add test to verify datagram socket timeout Vallish Vaidyeshwara
2017-08-18 20:18 ` Richard Cochran [this message]
2017-08-18 22:27 ` [PATCH RESEND 0/2] enable hires timer to timeout datagram socket Vallish Vaidyeshwara
2017-08-19 6:21 ` Richard Cochran
2017-08-20 1:47 ` Vallish Vaidyeshwara
2017-08-21 18:22 ` Vallish Vaidyeshwara
2017-08-22 6:23 ` Richard Cochran
2017-08-22 11:17 ` Vallish Vaidyeshwara
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170818201854.xes246oviptinwvq@localhost \
--to=richardcochran@gmail.com \
--cc=anchalag@amazon.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=eduval@amazon.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=vallish@amazon.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox