From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Brendan Jackman <brendan.jackman@arm.com>
Cc: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Joel Fernandes <joelaf@google.com>,
Andres Oportus <andresoportus@google.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@arm.com>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] sched/fair: Fix use of NULL with find_idlest_group
Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2017 22:22:00 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170821202200.GE32112@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87fuck3ipr.fsf@arm.com>
On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 06:59:28PM +0100, Brendan Jackman wrote:
> Hi Josef,
>
> Thanks for taking a look.
>
> On Mon, Aug 21 2017 at 17:26, Josef Bacik wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 04:21:28PM +0100, Brendan Jackman wrote:
> [...]
> >> - local_group = cpumask_test_cpu(this_cpu,
> >> - sched_group_span(group));
> >> -
> >
> > This isn't right is it? cpu isn't necessarily in the very first group of a sd
> > right?
>
> I think it is - I haven't grokked the sd/sg setup code in
> kernel/sched/topology.c but there is a comment[1] that I interpret as
> saying this. I'll take a more careful look tomorrow.
>
> [1] http://elixir.free-electrons.com/linux/v4.13-rc6/source/kernel/sched/topology.c#L786
>
> If I'm wrong, this can be rewritten not to use that assumption - I did
> it this way in the caller ("else if (group == sd->groups)") because I
> didn't want to use cpumask_test_cpu, and then changed it inside
> find_idlest_group so there weren't two ways of doing the same thing in
> the same neighbourhood of code.
No you are quite correct. The sched_domain of a CPU always includes that
CPU and the first group of a sched_domain is it's child domain and
therefore also includes that CPU.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-08-21 20:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-08-21 15:21 [PATCH 0/2] sched/fair: Tweaks for select_task_rq_fair slowpath Brendan Jackman
2017-08-21 15:21 ` [PATCH 1/2] sched/fair: Remove unnecessary comparison with -1 Brendan Jackman
2017-08-21 17:30 ` Josef Bacik
2017-08-21 15:21 ` [PATCH 2/2] sched/fair: Fix use of NULL with find_idlest_group Brendan Jackman
2017-08-21 17:26 ` Josef Bacik
2017-08-21 17:59 ` Brendan Jackman
2017-08-21 20:22 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2017-08-21 21:14 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-08-21 21:23 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-08-22 4:34 ` Joel Fernandes
2017-08-22 10:39 ` Brendan Jackman
2017-08-22 10:45 ` Brendan Jackman
2017-08-22 11:03 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-08-22 12:46 ` Brendan Jackman
2017-08-22 7:48 ` Vincent Guittot
2017-08-22 10:41 ` Brendan Jackman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170821202200.GE32112@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=andresoportus@google.com \
--cc=brendan.jackman@arm.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=joelaf@google.com \
--cc=josef@toxicpanda.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=morten.rasmussen@arm.com \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox