From: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>
To: Chris Lew <clew@codeaurora.org>
Cc: andy.gross@linaro.org, david.brown@linaro.org,
aneela@codeaurora.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] soc: qcom: smem: Support global partition
Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2017 17:32:25 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170823003225.GY29306@minitux> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f8341ef7-8e88-595a-feab-d294da977ac5@codeaurora.org>
On Tue 22 Aug 17:28 PDT 2017, Chris Lew wrote:
> On 8/21/2017 10:17 AM, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
[..]
> > > +static int qcom_smem_set_global_partition(struct qcom_smem *smem,
> > > + struct smem_ptable_entry *entry)
> > > +{
[..]
> > > + if (header->size != entry->size) {
> >
> > This happens to work, because they are both in the same endian. But
> > please sprinkle some le32_to_cpu() here as well.
> >
>
>
> These checks mimic the sanity checks being done in enumerate_partitions.
> Should I create a patch to increase le32_to_cpu usage in
> qcom_smem_enumerate_partitions?
>
Oops, yeah please do, just for completeness sake.
[..]
> > > @@ -647,6 +714,12 @@ static int qcom_smem_enumerate_partitions(struct qcom_smem *smem,
> > > host0 = le16_to_cpu(entry->host0);
> > > host1 = le16_to_cpu(entry->host1);
> > > + if (host0 == SMEM_GLOBAL_HOST && host0 == host1) {
> > > + if (qcom_smem_set_global_partition(smem, entry))
> > > + return -EINVAL;
> > > + continue;
> > > + }
> > > +
> >
> > As you're not able to leverage any of the checks from this loop I think
> > it's cleaner to duplicate the traversal of the partition table in both
> > functions and call the "search for global partition" directly from
> > probe - if the version indicates there should be one.
> >
>
>
> Ok, will set the global partition in the version case statement and error
> out of the probe if finding the global partition fails since it is not
> optional in the new version.
>
Sounds good.
Regards,
Bjorn
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-08-23 0:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-08-18 1:15 [PATCH 0/3] Qualcomm SMEM V12 Support Chris Lew
2017-08-18 1:15 ` [PATCH 1/3] soc: qcom: smem: Support global partition Chris Lew
2017-08-21 6:05 ` Arun Kumar Neelakantam
2017-08-21 17:17 ` Bjorn Andersson
2017-08-23 0:28 ` Chris Lew
2017-08-23 0:32 ` Bjorn Andersson [this message]
2017-08-18 1:15 ` [PATCH 2/3] soc: qcom: smem: Support dynamic item limit Chris Lew
2017-08-21 8:57 ` Arun Kumar Neelakantam
2017-08-21 17:33 ` Bjorn Andersson
2017-08-18 1:15 ` [PATCH 3/3] soc: qcom: smem: Increase the number of hosts Chris Lew
2017-08-21 17:34 ` Bjorn Andersson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170823003225.GY29306@minitux \
--to=bjorn.andersson@linaro.org \
--cc=andy.gross@linaro.org \
--cc=aneela@codeaurora.org \
--cc=clew@codeaurora.org \
--cc=david.brown@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-soc@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox