From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752251AbdH3SNG (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Aug 2017 14:13:06 -0400 Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.211]:51114 "EHLO newverein.lst.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751555AbdH3SNE (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Aug 2017 14:13:04 -0400 Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2017 20:13:02 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Jens Axboe , Linux-Next Mailing List , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Sagi Grimberg , Arnav Dawn , Guan Junxiong , Max Gurtovoy , James Smart , Martin Wilck , Jan =?iso-8859-1?Q?H=2E_Sch=F6nherr?= , "Martin K. Petersen" , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Philipp Reisner , Lars Ellenberg , Roland Kammerer Subject: Re: linux-next: Signed-off-bys missing for commits in the block tree Message-ID: <20170830181302.GA5734@lst.de> References: <20170831030647.19c22478@canb.auug.org.au> <20170830170936.GA3925@lst.de> <20170831033400.423f0e6b@canb.auug.org.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170831033400.423f0e6b@canb.auug.org.au> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 03:38:03AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > I would say that if you rebase someone's commit(s), then you are on the > > "patch's delivery path" and so should add a Signed-off-by tag. > > Yeah, I agree. Rebasing really is pretty much the exact same thing as > applying a patch." Ok, we'll get it right next time.