From: Martijn Coenen <maco@android.com>
To: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, john.stultz@linaro.org,
tkjos@google.com, arve@android.com, amit.pundir@linaro.org,
tglx@linutronix.de
Cc: peterz@infradead.org, hch@lst.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, maco@google.com, malchev@google.com,
ccross@android.com, Martijn Coenen <maco@android.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 08/13] ANDROID: binder: don't check prio permissions on restore.
Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2017 10:04:25 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170831080430.118765-9-maco@android.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170831080430.118765-1-maco@android.com>
Because we have disabled RT priority inheritance for
the regular binder domain, the following can happen:
1) thread A (prio 98) calls into thread B
2) because RT prio inheritance is disabled, thread B
runs at the lowest nice (prio 100) instead
3) thread B calls back into A; A will run at prio 100
for the duration of the transaction
4) When thread A is done with the call from B, we will
try to restore the prio back to 98. But, we fail
because the process doesn't hold CAP_SYS_NICE,
neither is RLIMIT_RT_PRIO set.
While the proper fix going forward will be to
correctly apply CAP_SYS_NICE or RLIMIT_RT_PRIO,
for now it seems reasonable to not check permissions
on the restore path.
Signed-off-by: Martijn Coenen <maco@android.com>
---
drivers/android/binder.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++--------
1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/android/binder.c b/drivers/android/binder.c
index 017693dd4ec1..0c0ecd78b9a7 100644
--- a/drivers/android/binder.c
+++ b/drivers/android/binder.c
@@ -1109,9 +1109,10 @@ static int to_kernel_prio(int policy, int user_priority)
}
/**
- * binder_set_priority() - sets the scheduler priority of a task
+ * binder_do_set_priority() - sets the scheduler priority of a task
* @task: task to set priority on
* @desired: desired priority to run at
+ * @verify: verify whether @task is allowed to run at @desired prio
*
* The scheduler policy of tasks is changed explicitly, because we want to
* support a few distinct features:
@@ -1145,8 +1146,9 @@ static int to_kernel_prio(int policy, int user_priority)
* temporarily runs at its original priority.
* 5) rt_mutex does not currently support PI for CFS tasks.
*/
-static void binder_set_priority(struct task_struct *task,
- struct binder_priority desired)
+static void binder_do_set_priority(struct task_struct *task,
+ struct binder_priority desired,
+ bool verify)
{
int priority; /* user-space prio value */
bool has_cap_nice;
@@ -1170,7 +1172,7 @@ static void binder_set_priority(struct task_struct *task,
priority = to_userspace_prio(policy, desired.prio);
- if (is_rt_policy(policy) && !has_cap_nice) {
+ if (verify && is_rt_policy(policy) && !has_cap_nice) {
long max_rtprio = task_rlimit(task, RLIMIT_RTPRIO);
if (max_rtprio == 0) {
@@ -1182,7 +1184,7 @@ static void binder_set_priority(struct task_struct *task,
}
}
- if (is_fair_policy(policy) && !has_cap_nice) {
+ if (verify && is_fair_policy(policy) && !has_cap_nice) {
long min_nice = rlimit_to_nice(task_rlimit(task, RLIMIT_NICE));
if (min_nice > MAX_NICE) {
@@ -1215,6 +1217,18 @@ static void binder_set_priority(struct task_struct *task,
set_user_nice(task, priority);
}
+static void binder_set_priority(struct task_struct *task,
+ struct binder_priority desired)
+{
+ binder_do_set_priority(task, desired, /* verify = */ true);
+}
+
+static void binder_restore_priority(struct task_struct *task,
+ struct binder_priority desired)
+{
+ binder_do_set_priority(task, desired, /* verify = */ false);
+}
+
static void binder_transaction_priority(struct task_struct *task,
struct binder_transaction *t,
struct binder_priority node_prio,
@@ -3251,7 +3265,7 @@ static void binder_transaction(struct binder_proc *proc,
binder_enqueue_work_ilocked(&t->work, &target_thread->todo);
binder_inner_proc_unlock(target_proc);
wake_up_interruptible_sync(&target_thread->wait);
- binder_set_priority(current, in_reply_to->saved_priority);
+ binder_restore_priority(current, in_reply_to->saved_priority);
binder_free_transaction(in_reply_to);
} else if (!(t->flags & TF_ONE_WAY)) {
BUG_ON(t->buffer->async_transaction != 0);
@@ -3340,7 +3354,7 @@ static void binder_transaction(struct binder_proc *proc,
BUG_ON(thread->return_error.cmd != BR_OK);
if (in_reply_to) {
- binder_set_priority(current, in_reply_to->saved_priority);
+ binder_restore_priority(current, in_reply_to->saved_priority);
thread->return_error.cmd = BR_TRANSACTION_COMPLETE;
binder_enqueue_work(thread->proc,
&thread->return_error.work,
@@ -3940,7 +3954,7 @@ static int binder_thread_read(struct binder_proc *proc,
wait_event_interruptible(binder_user_error_wait,
binder_stop_on_user_error < 2);
}
- binder_set_priority(current, proc->default_priority);
+ binder_restore_priority(current, proc->default_priority);
}
if (non_block) {
--
2.14.1.581.gf28d330327-goog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-08-31 8:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-08-31 8:04 [PATCH v2 00/13] ANDROID: binder: RT priority inheritance and small fixes Martijn Coenen
2017-08-31 8:04 ` [PATCH v2 01/13] ANDROID: binder: remove proc waitqueue Martijn Coenen
2017-08-31 8:04 ` [PATCH v2 02/13] ANDROID: binder: push new transactions to waiting threads Martijn Coenen
2017-08-31 8:04 ` [PATCH v2 03/13] ANDROID: binder: add support for RT prio inheritance Martijn Coenen
2017-08-31 8:18 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-08-31 8:27 ` Martijn Coenen
2017-08-31 11:32 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-08-31 12:00 ` Martijn Coenen
2017-08-31 12:21 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-09-01 7:24 ` Greg KH
2017-10-09 11:21 ` Martijn Coenen
2017-10-09 11:43 ` Greg KH
2017-08-31 8:04 ` [PATCH v2 04/13] ANDROID: binder: add min sched_policy to node Martijn Coenen
2017-08-31 8:04 ` [PATCH v2 05/13] ANDROID: binder: improve priority inheritance Martijn Coenen
2017-08-31 8:04 ` [PATCH v2 06/13] ANDROID: binder: add RT inheritance flag to node Martijn Coenen
2017-08-31 8:04 ` [PATCH v2 07/13] ANDROID: binder: Add BINDER_GET_NODE_DEBUG_INFO ioctl Martijn Coenen
2017-08-31 8:04 ` Martijn Coenen [this message]
2017-08-31 8:04 ` [PATCH v2 09/13] ANDROID: binder: Don't BUG_ON(!spin_is_locked()) Martijn Coenen
2017-08-31 8:04 ` [PATCH v2 10/13] ANDROID: binder: call poll_wait() unconditionally Martijn Coenen
2017-08-31 8:04 ` [PATCH v2 11/13] ANDROID: binder: don't enqueue death notifications to thread todo Martijn Coenen
2017-08-31 8:04 ` [PATCH v2 12/13] ANDROID: binder: don't queue async transactions to thread Martijn Coenen
2017-08-31 8:04 ` [PATCH v2 13/13] ANDROID: binder: Add tracing for binder priority inheritance Martijn Coenen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170831080430.118765-9-maco@android.com \
--to=maco@android.com \
--cc=amit.pundir@linaro.org \
--cc=arve@android.com \
--cc=ccross@android.com \
--cc=devel@driverdev.osuosl.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=john.stultz@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maco@google.com \
--cc=malchev@google.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tkjos@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox