From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>, Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/10] perf: Make sure we read only scheduled events
Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2017 09:21:33 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170901072133.GA14815@krava> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170828192359.jfcb55q5remlhfbw@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 09:23:59PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 06:27:30PM +0200, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> > Adding leader's state check into perf_output_read_group
> > to ensure we read only leader, which is scheduled in.
> >
> > Similar check is already there for siblings.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
> > ---
> > kernel/events/core.c | 10 +++++++---
> > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/kernel/events/core.c b/kernel/events/core.c
> > index 30e30e94ea32..9a2791afe051 100644
> > --- a/kernel/events/core.c
> > +++ b/kernel/events/core.c
> > @@ -5760,6 +5760,11 @@ void perf_event__output_id_sample(struct perf_event *event,
> > __perf_event__output_id_sample(handle, sample);
> > }
> >
> > +static bool can_read(struct perf_event *event)
> > +{
> > + return event->state == PERF_EVENT_STATE_ACTIVE;
> > +}
> > +
> > static void perf_output_read_one(struct perf_output_handle *handle,
> > struct perf_event *event,
> > u64 enabled, u64 running)
> > @@ -5800,7 +5805,7 @@ static void perf_output_read_group(struct perf_output_handle *handle,
> > if (read_format & PERF_FORMAT_TOTAL_TIME_RUNNING)
> > values[n++] = running;
> >
> > - if (leader != event)
> > + if ((leader != event) && can_read(leader))
> > leader->pmu->read(leader);
> >
> > values[n++] = perf_event_count(leader);
> > @@ -5812,8 +5817,7 @@ static void perf_output_read_group(struct perf_output_handle *handle,
> > list_for_each_entry(sub, &leader->sibling_list, group_entry) {
> > n = 0;
> >
> > - if ((sub != event) &&
> > - (sub->state == PERF_EVENT_STATE_ACTIVE))
> > + if ((sub != event) && can_read(sub))
> > sub->pmu->read(sub);
> >
> > values[n++] = perf_event_count(sub);
>
> I'm not seeing how this makes sense. Groups should either _all_ be
> scheduled or not at all. Please explain.
so this could be called for event which is already scheduled out:
perf_event_exit_task_context
task_ctx_sched_out <- unschedules event
perf_event_exit_event
sync_child_event
perf_event_read_event
perf_output_read
if leader != events (which is, if you don't have Mark's fix),
we'll call leader->pmu->read(leader) even if it's not scheduled in
jirka
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-09-01 7:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-08-24 16:27 [PATCH 00/10] perf: inherit_stat related fixes Jiri Olsa
2017-08-24 16:27 ` [PATCH 01/10] perf/x86: Add warning on proper cpu during event's update Jiri Olsa
2017-08-28 19:24 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-08-24 16:27 ` [PATCH 02/10] perf: Fix leader for removed sibling event in perf_group_detach Jiri Olsa
2017-08-28 19:23 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-08-24 16:27 ` [PATCH 03/10] perf: Make sure we read only scheduled events Jiri Olsa
2017-08-28 19:23 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-09-01 7:21 ` Jiri Olsa [this message]
2017-08-24 16:27 ` [PATCH 04/10] perf record: Set read_format for inherit_stat Jiri Olsa
2017-08-29 21:20 ` [tip:perf/core] " tip-bot for Jiri Olsa
2017-08-24 16:27 ` [PATCH 05/10] perf report: Add dump_read function Jiri Olsa
2017-08-29 21:20 ` [tip:perf/core] " tip-bot for Jiri Olsa
2017-08-24 16:27 ` [PATCH 06/10] perf values: Fix thread index bug Jiri Olsa
2017-08-29 21:21 ` [tip:perf/core] " tip-bot for Jiri Olsa
2017-08-24 16:27 ` [PATCH 07/10] perf values: Fix allocation check Jiri Olsa
2017-08-29 21:21 ` [tip:perf/core] " tip-bot for Jiri Olsa
2017-08-24 16:27 ` [PATCH 08/10] perf values: Zero value buffers Jiri Olsa
2017-08-29 21:21 ` [tip:perf/core] " tip-bot for Jiri Olsa
2017-08-24 16:27 ` [PATCH 09/10] perf report: Group stat values on global event id Jiri Olsa
2017-08-29 21:22 ` [tip:perf/core] " tip-bot for Jiri Olsa
2017-08-24 16:27 ` [PATCH 10/10] perf stat: Support inherit/no-inherit terms Jiri Olsa
2017-08-24 16:30 ` Andi Kleen
2017-08-24 16:45 ` Jiri Olsa
2017-08-25 18:57 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170901072133.GA14815@krava \
--to=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=dsahern@gmail.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox