From: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>
To: Stefan Bruens <stefan.bruens@rwth-aachen.de>
Cc: linux-sunxi <linux-sunxi@googlegroups.com>,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, dmaengine@vger.kernel.org,
vinod.koul@intel.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] dmaengine: sun6i: Correct DMA support on H3
Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2017 15:35:49 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170901133549.cr2ivmfr5mnrdujg@flea> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a649f98d4ac44abc873c5110ce9363e5@rwthex-w2-b.rwth-ad.de>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 7151 bytes --]
On Fri, Sep 01, 2017 at 05:04:54AM +0200, Stefan Bruens wrote:
> On Donnerstag, 31. August 2017 16:51:35 CEST Maxime Ripard wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 01:36:07AM +0200, Stefan Brüns wrote:
> > > +/* Between SoC generations, there are some significant differences:
> > > + * - A23 added a clock gate register
> > > + * - the H3 burst length field has a different offset
> > > + */
> >
> > This is not the proper comment style.
> >
> > > +enum dmac_variant {
> > > + DMAC_VARIANT_A31,
> > > + DMAC_VARIANT_A23,
> > > + DMAC_VARIANT_H3,
> > > +};
> > > +
> >
> > And this is redundant with what we already have in our structures.
>
> Actually, its not. For H3, there are currently at least 3 register compatible
> SoCs: H5 is identical, R40 has 16 dma channels, A64 has 8 channels. So if the
> current config structure is kept, we need 3 different compatible strings. Same
> for the A23, which is register compatible to e.g. A83t and V3s, but with
> different numbers of DMA channels.
>
> So either you decorate the code with a cascade of
>
> if ((of_is_compatible(..A23..) || of_is_compatible(..A83T..) || ...) {
> } else if ((of_is_compatible(..H3..) || of_is_compatible(..A64..) || ...) {
> } else { /* A31 */
> }
>
> in a number of places, or you do it just once.
That's not how you retrieve the structures. They are already
associated to the compatible, and you need to do a single lookup to
get them. So that's nowhere near what you're suggesting. You can have
a look at the of_match_device in the probe function.
>
> >
> > > /*
> > >
> > > * Hardware channels / ports representation
> > > *
> > >
> > > @@ -101,6 +116,7 @@ struct sun6i_dma_config {
> > >
> > > u32 nr_max_channels;
> > > u32 nr_max_requests;
> > > u32 nr_max_vchans;
> > >
> > > + enum dmac_variant dmac_variant;
> > >
> > > };
> > >
> > > /*
> > >
> > > @@ -240,8 +256,12 @@ static inline s8 convert_burst(u32 maxburst)
> > >
> > > switch (maxburst) {
> > >
> > > case 1:
> > > return 0;
> > >
> > > + case 4:
> > > + return 1;
> > >
> > > case 8:
> > > return 2;
> > >
> > > + case 16:
> > > + return 3;
> > >
> > > default:
> > > return -EINVAL;
> > >
> > > }
> > >
> > > @@ -249,11 +269,7 @@ static inline s8 convert_burst(u32 maxburst)
> > >
> > > static inline s8 convert_buswidth(enum dma_slave_buswidth addr_width)
> > > {
> > >
> > > - if ((addr_width < DMA_SLAVE_BUSWIDTH_1_BYTE) ||
> > > - (addr_width > DMA_SLAVE_BUSWIDTH_4_BYTES))
> > > - return -EINVAL;
> > > -
> > > - return addr_width >> 1;
> > > + return ilog2(addr_width);
> > >
> > > }
> >
> > This isn't really the same operation. There should be some explanation
> > about why it's the right thing to do.
>
> For 1, 2 and 4 it is the same. The correct register value for 8 bytes,
> supported by H3, H5, A64 and R40, is 3.
That should be in a separate patch, with that in the commit log.
> > > static size_t sun6i_get_chan_size(struct sun6i_pchan *pchan)
> > >
> > > @@ -499,45 +515,58 @@ static int set_config(struct sun6i_dma_dev *sdev,
> > >
> > > enum dma_transfer_direction direction,
> > > u32 *p_cfg)
> > >
> > > {
> > >
> > > + enum dma_slave_buswidth src_addr_width, dst_addr_width;
> > > + u32 src_maxburst, dst_maxburst, supported_burst_length;
> > >
> > > s8 src_width, dst_width, src_burst, dst_burst;
> > >
> > > + src_addr_width = sconfig->src_addr_width;
> > > + dst_addr_width = sconfig->dst_addr_width;
> > > + src_maxburst = sconfig->src_maxburst;
> > > + dst_maxburst = sconfig->dst_maxburst;
> > > +
> > > + if (sdev->cfg->dmac_variant == DMAC_VARIANT_H3)
> > > + supported_burst_length = BIT(1) | BIT(4) | BIT(8) | BIT(16);
> > > + else
> > > + supported_burst_length = BIT(1) | BIT(8);
> >
> > This could be stored in the structure for example.
>
> Which one? sun6i_dma_dev? sun6i_dma_config?
The one associated with the compatible, so sun6i_dma_config.
>
> > > switch (direction) {
> > >
> > > case DMA_MEM_TO_DEV:
> > > - src_burst = convert_burst(sconfig->src_maxburst ?
> > > - sconfig->src_maxburst : 8);
> > > - src_width = convert_buswidth(sconfig->src_addr_width !=
> > > - DMA_SLAVE_BUSWIDTH_UNDEFINED ?
> > > - sconfig->src_addr_width :
> > > - DMA_SLAVE_BUSWIDTH_4_BYTES);
> > > - dst_burst = convert_burst(sconfig->dst_maxburst);
> > > - dst_width = convert_buswidth(sconfig->dst_addr_width);
> > > + if (src_addr_width == DMA_SLAVE_BUSWIDTH_UNDEFINED)
> > > + src_addr_width = DMA_SLAVE_BUSWIDTH_4_BYTES;
> > > + src_maxburst = src_maxburst ? src_maxburst : 8;
> > >
> > > break;
> > >
> > > case DMA_DEV_TO_MEM:
> > > - src_burst = convert_burst(sconfig->src_maxburst);
> > > - src_width = convert_buswidth(sconfig->src_addr_width);
> > > - dst_burst = convert_burst(sconfig->dst_maxburst ?
> > > - sconfig->dst_maxburst : 8);
> > > - dst_width = convert_buswidth(sconfig->dst_addr_width !=
> > > - DMA_SLAVE_BUSWIDTH_UNDEFINED ?
> > > - sconfig->dst_addr_width :
> > > - DMA_SLAVE_BUSWIDTH_4_BYTES);
> > > + if (dst_addr_width == DMA_SLAVE_BUSWIDTH_UNDEFINED)
> > > + dst_addr_width = DMA_SLAVE_BUSWIDTH_4_BYTES;
> > > + dst_maxburst = dst_maxburst ? dst_maxburst : 8;
> > >
> > > break;
> > >
> > > default:
> > > return -EINVAL;
> > >
> > > }
> > >
> > > - if (src_burst < 0)
> > > - return src_burst;
> > > - if (src_width < 0)
> > > - return src_width;
> > > - if (dst_burst < 0)
> > > - return dst_burst;
> > > - if (dst_width < 0)
> > > - return dst_width;
> > > -
> > > - *p_cfg = DMA_CHAN_CFG_SRC_BURST(src_burst) |
> > > - DMA_CHAN_CFG_SRC_WIDTH(src_width) |
> > > - DMA_CHAN_CFG_DST_BURST(dst_burst) |
> > > + if (!(BIT(src_addr_width) & sdev->slave.src_addr_widths))
> > > + return -EINVAL;
> > > + if (!(BIT(dst_addr_width) & sdev->slave.dst_addr_widths))
> > > + return -EINVAL;
> > > + if (!(BIT(src_maxburst) & supported_burst_length))
> > > + return -EINVAL;
> > > + if (!(BIT(dst_maxburst) & supported_burst_length))
> > > + return -EINVAL;
> > > +
> > > + src_width = convert_buswidth(src_addr_width);
> > > + dst_width = convert_buswidth(dst_addr_width);
> > > + dst_burst = convert_burst(dst_maxburst);
> > > + src_burst = convert_burst(src_maxburst);
> >
> > I'm not sure what you're trying to do here. Could you split your patch
> > by logical change, this doesn't seem related to just supporting the
> > H3, but a heavier refactoring.
>
> Untangling 3 independent steps - handling of DMA_SLAVE_BUSWIDTH_UNDEFINED,
> range checking, and conversion to register value. As the valid ranges depend
> on the controller, the code is much easier to read if the range check is done
> first, and then the conversion.
Please make separate patches as well for the splitting up of each of
those steps.
Thanks!
Maxime
--
Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 801 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-09-01 13:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-08-30 23:36 [PATCH 0/3] dmaengine: Fix DMA on current allwinner SoCs, add A64 support Stefan Brüns
2017-08-30 23:36 ` [PATCH 1/3] dmaengine: sun6i: Correct DMA support on H3 Stefan Brüns
2017-08-31 14:51 ` Maxime Ripard
2017-09-01 3:04 ` Stefan Bruens
2017-09-01 13:35 ` Maxime Ripard [this message]
2017-09-01 14:42 ` Brüns, Stefan
2017-09-04 6:50 ` Maxime Ripard
2017-08-30 23:36 ` [PATCH 2/3] arm64: allwinner: a64: Add device node for DMA controller Stefan Brüns
2017-09-11 22:00 ` Rob Herring
2017-08-30 23:36 ` [PATCH 3/3] dmaengine: sun6i: Add support for Allwinner A64 Stefan Brüns
2017-08-31 11:44 ` Code Kipper
2017-08-31 14:52 ` Maxime Ripard
2017-08-31 16:35 ` [linux-sunxi] " Code Kipper
2017-09-01 0:31 ` Andre Przywara
2017-09-01 1:19 ` Stefan Bruens
2017-09-01 22:32 ` André Przywara
2017-09-02 0:38 ` Stefan Bruens
2017-09-02 2:02 ` Stefan Bruens
2017-09-03 23:14 ` André Przywara
2017-09-01 6:04 ` Maxime Ripard
2017-09-01 22:35 ` André Przywara
2017-09-04 7:04 ` Maxime Ripard
2017-09-04 8:14 ` André Przywara
2017-09-08 14:39 ` Maxime Ripard
2017-09-08 14:57 ` Andre Przywara
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170901133549.cr2ivmfr5mnrdujg@flea \
--to=maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dmaengine@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-sunxi@googlegroups.com \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=stefan.bruens@rwth-aachen.de \
--cc=vinod.koul@intel.com \
--cc=wens@csie.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox