From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752795AbdIESuB (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Sep 2017 14:50:01 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:32844 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752221AbdIESuA (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Sep 2017 14:50:00 -0400 DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org D375C21E92 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=acme@kernel.org Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2017 15:49:57 -0300 From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo To: Andi Kleen Cc: Andi Kleen , jolsa@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] perf, tools: Support user regs in perf script Message-ID: <20170905184957.GK22298@kernel.org> References: <20170905170029.19722-1-andi@firstfloor.org> <20170905170029.19722-2-andi@firstfloor.org> <20170905174830.GF22298@kernel.org> <20170905182820.GW28715@tassilo.jf.intel.com> <20170905184735.GJ22298@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170905184735.GJ22298@kernel.org> X-Url: http://acmel.wordpress.com User-Agent: Mutt/1.8.3 (2017-05-23) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Em Tue, Sep 05, 2017 at 03:47:35PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu: > Em Tue, Sep 05, 2017 at 11:28:20AM -0700, Andi Kleen escreveu: > > On Tue, Sep 05, 2017 at 02:48:30PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > > > Em Tue, Sep 05, 2017 at 10:00:29AM -0700, Andi Kleen escreveu: > > > > From: Andi Kleen > > > > > > > > Teach perf script to print user regs. > > > > > > > > % perf record --user-regs=ip,sp ... > > > > % perf script -F ip,sym,uregs > > > > > > Applied the first patch, but this one isn't applying, please check. > > > > It conflicts with the physical address patches, will rebase > > and resend. > > > > Or it's usually just trivial conflicts with the perf script options > > if you want to take a stab. > > yeah, done. But you did it in a different order, i.e. in some hunks you put it before the code handling phys_addr, so I'll use your patch instead, since you did it anyway. - Arnaldo