From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751591AbdIFGPr (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Sep 2017 02:15:47 -0400 Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.211]:50836 "EHLO newverein.lst.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750752AbdIFGPq (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Sep 2017 02:15:46 -0400 Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2017 08:15:45 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Yu Chen Cc: Thomas Gleixner , x86@kernel.org, Ingo Molnar , "H. Peter Anvin" , Rui Zhang , LKML , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Len Brown , Dan Williams , Christoph Hellwig , Peter Zijlstra Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4][RFC v2] x86/apic: Spread the vectors by choosing the idlest CPU Message-ID: <20170906061545.GA20519@lst.de> References: <20170906041337.GC23250@localhost.localdomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170906041337.GC23250@localhost.localdomain> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Sep 06, 2017 at 12:13:38PM +0800, Yu Chen wrote: > I agree, the driver could be rewritten, but it might take some time, so > meanwhile I'm looking at also other possible optimization. Which driver are we talking about anyway? Let's start looking at it and fix the issue there.