From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755194AbdIGJdy (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Sep 2017 05:33:54 -0400 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:55854 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755057AbdIGJdu (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Sep 2017 05:33:50 -0400 Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2017 11:33:48 +0200 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: Pushkar Jambhlekar Cc: Georgiana Rodica Chelu , William Blough , Ivan Safonov , Yamanappagouda Patil , devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] drivers/staging/rtl8188eu: cleanup crc32_init logic Message-ID: <20170907093348.GD8102@kroah.com> References: <1504759852-2053-1-git-send-email-pushkar.iit@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1504759852-2053-1-git-send-email-pushkar.iit@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.0 (2017-09-02) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Sep 07, 2017 at 10:20:52AM +0530, Pushkar Jambhlekar wrote: > crc32_init is using unnecessary else condition. Cleaningup this function > > Signed-off-by: Pushkar Jambhlekar > --- > drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/core/rtw_security.c | 42 +++++++++++++-------------- > 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/core/rtw_security.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/core/rtw_security.c > index b283a490..9d17204 100644 > --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/core/rtw_security.c > +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/core/rtw_security.c > @@ -94,29 +94,29 @@ static u8 crc32_reverseBit(u8 data) > > static void crc32_init(void) > { > - if (bcrc32initialized == 1) { > + if (bcrc32initialized == 1) > return; > - } else { > - int i, j; > - u32 c; > - u8 *p = (u8 *)&c, *p1; > - u8 k; > - > - c = 0x12340000; > - > - for (i = 0; i < 256; ++i) { > - k = crc32_reverseBit((u8)i); > - for (c = ((u32)k) << 24, j = 8; j > 0; --j) > - c = c & 0x80000000 ? (c << 1) ^ CRC32_POLY : (c << 1); > - p1 = (u8 *)&crc32_table[i]; > - > - p1[0] = crc32_reverseBit(p[3]); > - p1[1] = crc32_reverseBit(p[2]); > - p1[2] = crc32_reverseBit(p[1]); > - p1[3] = crc32_reverseBit(p[0]); > - } > - bcrc32initialized = 1; > + > + int i, j; > + u32 c; > + u8 *p = (u8 *)&c, *p1; > + u8 k; > + > + c = 0x12340000; > + > + for (i = 0; i < 256; ++i) { > + k = crc32_reverseBit((u8)i); > + for (c = ((u32)k) << 24, j = 8; j > 0; --j) > + c = c & 0x80000000 ? (c << 1) ^ CRC32_POLY : (c << 1); > + p1 = (u8 *)&crc32_table[i]; > + > + p1[0] = crc32_reverseBit(p[3]); > + p1[1] = crc32_reverseBit(p[2]); > + p1[2] = crc32_reverseBit(p[1]); > + p1[3] = crc32_reverseBit(p[0]); > } > + > + bcrc32initialized = 1; > } > > static __le32 getcrc32(u8 *buf, int len) Always test build your code and ensure that you did not add any new build warnings or errors :(