From: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>
To: Colin King <colin.king@canonical.com>
Cc: Moni Shoua <monis@mellanox.com>,
Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com>,
Sean Hefty <sean.hefty@intel.com>,
Hal Rosenstock <hal.rosenstock@gmail.com>,
linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] IB/rxe: check for allocation failure on elem
Date: Sat, 9 Sep 2017 15:56:07 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170909125607.GA22465@mtr-leonro.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170908143745.2445-1-colin.king@canonical.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1174 bytes --]
On Fri, Sep 08, 2017 at 03:37:45PM +0100, Colin King wrote:
> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
>
> The allocation for elem may fail (especially because we're using
> GFP_ATOMIC) so best to check for a null return. This fixes a potential
> null pointer dereference when assigning elem->pool.
>
> Detected by CoverityScan CID#1357507 ("Dereference null return value")
>
> Fixes: 8700e3e7c485 ("Soft RoCE driver")
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
> ---
> drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_pool.c | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_pool.c b/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_pool.c
> index c1b5f38f31a5..3b4916680018 100644
> --- a/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_pool.c
> +++ b/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_pool.c
> @@ -404,6 +404,8 @@ void *rxe_alloc(struct rxe_pool *pool)
> elem = kmem_cache_zalloc(pool_cache(pool),
> (pool->flags & RXE_POOL_ATOMIC) ?
> GFP_ATOMIC : GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!elem)
> + return NULL;
>
It is not enough to simply return NULL, you also should release "pool" too.
Thanks
> elem->pool = pool;
> kref_init(&elem->ref_cnt);
> --
> 2.14.1
>
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-09-09 12:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-09-08 14:37 [PATCH] IB/rxe: check for allocation failure on elem Colin King
2017-09-09 12:56 ` Leon Romanovsky [this message]
2017-09-12 14:48 ` Leon Romanovsky
2017-10-09 13:16 ` Doug Ledford
2017-10-09 13:18 ` Colin Ian King
2017-10-09 16:13 ` Doug Ledford
2017-10-09 13:43 ` Leon Romanovsky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170909125607.GA22465@mtr-leonro.local \
--to=leon@kernel.org \
--cc=colin.king@canonical.com \
--cc=dledford@redhat.com \
--cc=hal.rosenstock@gmail.com \
--cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=monis@mellanox.com \
--cc=sean.hefty@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox