From: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
To: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com>,
linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
dm-devel@redhat.com, Bart Van Assche <Bart.VanAssche@wdc.com>,
Alasdair Kergon <agk@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] dm: allow device-mapper to operate without dax support
Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2017 10:41:11 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170911144111.GA15556@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <150169668989.39569.8174620146135008137.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com>
On Wed, Aug 02 2017 at 1:58pm -0400,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> wrote:
> Rather than have device-mapper directly 'select DAX', let the fact that
> BLK_DEV_PMEM selects dax act as a gate for the device-mapper dax
> support. We arrange for all the dax core routines to compile to nops
> when CONFIG_DAX=n. With that in place we can simply handle the
> alloc_dax() error as expected and ifdef out the other device-mapper-dax
> support code.
>
> Now, if dax is provided by a leaf driver that driver may only arrange to
> compile the dax core as a module. Since device-mapper dax support is
> consumed by the always-built-in portion of the device-mapper
> implementation we need to upgrade from DAX=m to DAX=y.
I applied the patches and then got nervous once I dug in.. this last
paragraph makes little sense to me. "the always-built-in portion of the
device-mapper implementation" is why: DM core can happily be compiled as
a module (dm-mod.ko).
And I'm not sure why you're referencing DAX related
drivers/md/dm-builtin.c, why are you attachd DM's DAX support to that?
I'm not seeing where that is actually happening.
I don't see why DM's support for DAX would need to force DAX to be
builtin rather than just a module.
Sorry I didn't get around to looking at this until now, but it seems you
went wrong along the way? Or maybe I'm just missing something?
Mike
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-09-11 14:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-08-02 17:57 [PATCH v3 0/2] dax, dm: stop requiring dax for device-mapper Dan Williams
2017-08-02 17:58 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] dax: introduce CONFIG_DAX_DRIVER Dan Williams
2017-08-02 17:58 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] dm: allow device-mapper to operate without dax support Dan Williams
2017-09-11 14:41 ` Mike Snitzer [this message]
2017-09-11 15:56 ` Dan Williams
2017-08-02 18:55 ` [PATCH v3 0/2] dax, dm: stop requiring dax for device-mapper Mike Snitzer
2017-09-09 18:56 ` Dan Williams
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170911144111.GA15556@redhat.com \
--to=snitzer@redhat.com \
--cc=Bart.VanAssche@wdc.com \
--cc=agk@redhat.com \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org \
--cc=lkp@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox