public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Shaohua Li <shli@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
	lizefan@huawei.com, tglx@linutronix.de, kernel-team@fb.com,
	axboe@kernel.dk, Shaohua Li <shli@fb.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 4/4] block/loop: make loop cgroup aware
Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2017 14:42:27 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170913214226.GD378890@devbig577.frc2.facebook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2f16f7a5176195bc70a2c10dd7fa11ea85b9145f.1505335620.git.shli@fb.com>

On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 02:01:29PM -0700, Shaohua Li wrote:
> From: Shaohua Li <shli@fb.com>
> 
> loop block device handles IO in a separate thread. The actual IO
> dispatched isn't cloned from the IO loop device received, so the
> dispatched IO loses the cgroup context.
> 
> I'm ignoring buffer IO case now, which is quite complicated.  Making the
> loop thread aware cgroup context doesn't really help. The loop device
> only writes to a single file. In current writeback cgroup
> implementation, the file can only belong to one cgroup.
> 
> For direct IO case, we could workaround the issue in theory. For
> example, say we assign cgroup1 5M/s BW for loop device and cgroup2
> 10M/s. We can create a special cgroup for loop thread and assign at
> least 15M/s for the underlayer disk. In this way, we correctly throttle
> the two cgroups. But this is tricky to setup.
> 
> This patch tries to address the issue. We record bio's css in loop
> command. When loop thread is handling the command, we then use the API
> provided in patch 1 to set the css for current task. The bio layer will
> use the css for new IO (from patch 3).
> 
> Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shli@fb.com>

Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>

Thanks.

-- 
tejun

      reply	other threads:[~2017-09-13 21:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-09-13 21:01 [PATCH V2 0/4] block: make loop block device cgroup aware Shaohua Li
2017-09-13 21:01 ` [PATCH V2 1/4] kthread: add a mechanism to store cgroup info Shaohua Li
2017-09-13 21:38   ` Tejun Heo
2017-09-13 21:43     ` Tejun Heo
2017-09-13 22:30     ` Shaohua Li
2017-09-13 21:01 ` [PATCH V2 2/4] blkcg: delete unused APIs Shaohua Li
2017-09-13 21:40   ` Tejun Heo
2017-09-13 21:01 ` [PATCH V2 3/4] block: make blkcg aware of kthread stored original cgroup info Shaohua Li
2017-09-13 21:42   ` Tejun Heo
2017-09-13 21:01 ` [PATCH V2 4/4] block/loop: make loop cgroup aware Shaohua Li
2017-09-13 21:42   ` Tejun Heo [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170913214226.GD378890@devbig577.frc2.facebook.com \
    --to=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lizefan@huawei.com \
    --cc=shli@fb.com \
    --cc=shli@kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox