From: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] x86/mm changes for v4.14: PCID support, 5-level paging support, Secure Memory Encryption support
Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2017 13:26:09 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170915112609.GB32516@amd> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170907080709.hwospdejr2ztmqr7@gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2085 bytes --]
On Thu 2017-09-07 10:07:09, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 2:40 PM, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hm, just as background, there are no regression reports I'm aware of
> > > against any of these trees, plus most of the dangerous commits have
> > > been in linux-next for at least two weeks - the majority of them even
> > > longer. The last 2-4 commits of x86/mm are fresher.
> >
> > Side note: I do not believe a lot of people actually run linux-next on
> > laptops, so suspend/resume likely doesn't get a lot of testing in
> > next.
> >
> > I think most people who run linux-next tend to be automation things on farms.
>
> Yeah, so 10af6235e0d3 was in linux-next for over a month, yet no-one reported the
> bug.
>
> > Don't get me wrong - I love linux-next and your tip testing, but I
> > think linux-next is best for finding build errors etc big integration
> > issues, with some very rudimentary actual boot checking.
> >
> > Maybe I'm wrong.
>
> I don't think you are wrong - most boot tests don't involve laptops. linux-next is
> mostly server oriented - and servers are often more debuggable than laptops. (Have
> actual serial ports or physical network connections with serial emulation, etc.)
>
> I tried to maintain a laptop testbox in -tip testing with netconsole for a time -
> but it was quite a bit of pain so I eventually dropped it. (Not that the simple
> boot + kernel build test that -tip does would have uncovered this particular bug.)
Some time ago, Tony Lindgren asked me to test Nokia N900 on -next from
time to time. I do, and it uncovers problems from time to time.
Perhaps if Linus or you asks for a volunteer, they can get one? We
have people submitting patches due to various challenges, perhaps "run
-next for a month" would be suitable challenge?
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 181 bytes --]
prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-09-15 11:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-09-04 9:31 [GIT PULL] x86/mm changes for v4.14: PCID support, 5-level paging support, Secure Memory Encryption support Ingo Molnar
2017-09-04 12:23 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2017-09-04 13:01 ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-09-04 13:54 ` Ingo Molnar
2017-09-05 21:17 ` Linus Torvalds
2017-09-05 21:37 ` Andy Lutomirski
2017-09-05 21:44 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-09-05 21:40 ` Ingo Molnar
2017-09-05 21:45 ` Linus Torvalds
2017-09-05 22:33 ` Linus Torvalds
2017-09-05 22:35 ` Andy Lutomirski
2017-09-05 23:09 ` Linus Torvalds
2017-09-06 20:43 ` Jiri Kosina
2017-09-06 21:16 ` Jiri Kosina
2017-09-06 22:26 ` Andy Lutomirski
2017-09-05 21:50 ` Linus Torvalds
2017-09-07 8:07 ` Ingo Molnar
2017-09-07 8:13 ` Ingo Molnar
2017-09-15 11:26 ` Pavel Machek [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170915112609.GB32516@amd \
--to=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox