From: Haneen Mohammed <hamohammed.sa@gmail.com>
To: outreachy-kernel <outreachy-kernel@googlegroups.com>
Cc: Oleg Drokin <oleg.drokin@intel.com>,
Andreas Dilger <andreas.dilger@intel.com>,
James Simmons <jsimmons@infradead.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
lustre-devel@lists.lustre.org, devel@driverdev.osuosl.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] staging: lustre: lnet: Replace list_for_each with list_for_each_entry
Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2017 18:41:48 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170916004148.GA25693@Haneen> (raw)
Replace use of the combination of list_for_each and list_entry
with list_for_each_entry to simplify the code and remove variables
that are used only in list_for_each.
Issue found and corrected using Coccinelle script:
@r@
expression head, member, e;
type T1, T2, T3;
iterator name list_for_each, list_for_each_entry;
identifier pos, var;
@@
-T1 *pos;
...when!=pos=e;
-list_for_each(pos, head)
+list_for_each_entry(var, head, member)
{
...when!=pos=e;
when!=T3 *var;
-var = list_entry(pos, T2, member);
...when!=pos=e;
}
...when!=pos=e;
Signed-off-by: Haneen Mohammed <hamohammed.sa@gmail.com>
---
drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/lnet/router.c | 9 ++-------
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/lnet/router.c b/drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/lnet/router.c
index 3df101b..b8eba33 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/lnet/router.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/lnet/router.c
@@ -222,15 +222,12 @@ struct lnet_remotenet *
lnet_find_net_locked(__u32 net)
{
struct lnet_remotenet *rnet;
- struct list_head *tmp;
struct list_head *rn_list;
LASSERT(!the_lnet.ln_shutdown);
rn_list = lnet_net2rnethash(net);
- list_for_each(tmp, rn_list) {
- rnet = list_entry(tmp, struct lnet_remotenet, lrn_list);
-
+ list_for_each_entry(rnet, rn_list, lrn_list) {
if (rnet->lrn_net == net)
return rnet;
}
@@ -243,7 +240,6 @@ static void lnet_shuffle_seed(void)
__u32 lnd_type, seed[2];
struct timespec64 ts;
struct lnet_ni *ni;
- struct list_head *tmp;
if (seeded)
return;
@@ -254,8 +250,7 @@ static void lnet_shuffle_seed(void)
* Nodes with small feet have little entropy
* the NID for this node gives the most entropy in the low bits
*/
- list_for_each(tmp, &the_lnet.ln_nis) {
- ni = list_entry(tmp, struct lnet_ni, ni_list);
+ list_for_each_entry(ni, &the_lnet.ln_nis, ni_list) {
lnd_type = LNET_NETTYP(LNET_NIDNET(ni->ni_nid));
if (lnd_type != LOLND)
--
2.7.4
next reply other threads:[~2017-09-16 0:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-09-16 0:41 Haneen Mohammed [this message]
2017-09-16 11:23 ` [Outreachy kernel] [PATCH] staging: lustre: lnet: Replace list_for_each with list_for_each_entry Julia Lawall
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170916004148.GA25693@Haneen \
--to=hamohammed.sa@gmail.com \
--cc=andreas.dilger@intel.com \
--cc=devel@driverdev.osuosl.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jsimmons@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lustre-devel@lists.lustre.org \
--cc=oleg.drokin@intel.com \
--cc=outreachy-kernel@googlegroups.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox