public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Markus Trippelsdorf <markus@trippelsdorf.de>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Firmware files removal for 4.14-rc1
Date: Sat, 16 Sep 2017 19:20:51 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170916172051.GB1846@x4> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170916165535.GA4577@kroah.com>

On 2017.09.16 at 09:55 -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 16, 2017 at 08:25:03AM +0200, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
> > On 2017.09.16 at 06:51 +0200, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
> > > On 2017.09.15 at 11:56 -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> > > > The following changes since commit 569dbb88e80deb68974ef6fdd6a13edb9d686261:
> > > >
> > > >   Linux 4.13 (2017-09-03 13:56:17 -0700)
> > > >
> > > > are available in the git repository at:
> > > >
> > > >   git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gregkh/driver-core.git/ tags/firmware_removal-4.14-rc1
> > > >
> > > > for you to fetch changes up to 5620a0d1aacd554ebebcff373e31107bb1ef7769:
> > > >
> > > >   firmware: delete in-kernel firmware (2017-09-14 14:49:41 -0700)
> > > >
> > > > ----------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > Firmware removal patch for 4.14-rc1
> > > >
> > > > Many many years ago (at the kernel summit in Boston), we all came to the
> > > > agreement that the firmware/ tree should be dropped from the kernel, and
> > > > everyone use the linux-firmware package instead.  For some minor reason,
> > > > David Woodhouse didn't send the pull request at that point in time, and
> > > > everyone forgot about this.
> > > >
> > > > The topic came up in the hallway track at the Plumbers conference this
> > > > week, so here's a single patch that drops the whole firmware tree.  The
> > > > last firmware update was back in 2013, and all distros have been using
> > > > linux-firmware instead since at least that year, if not before.  The
> > > > only commits to that directory since 2013 was some kbuild fixups for
> > > > various build tool issues.
> > > >
> > > > So lets finally drop this, we don't need to lug them around in the
> > > > kernel source tree anymore, especially as no one wants or uses them.
> > > 
> > > Well, it is one thing to drop the redundant binary blobs. But is another
> > > to break perfectly fine setups that worked for years, e.g.:
> > > 
> > > CONFIG_FW_LOADER=y
> > > CONFIG_FIRMWARE_IN_KERNEL=y
> > > CONFIG_EXTRA_FIRMWARE="amd-ucode/microcode_amd.bin radeon/R600_rlc.bin"
> > > CONFIG_EXTRA_FIRMWARE_DIR="/lib/firmware"
> > > 
> > > Please restore the support for built-in firmware.
> 
> How did that break anything?  You are still using external firmware,
> right?
> 
> That just adds an empty Makefile that doesn't actually build anything
> into the kernel.  What error is this fixing?  I did a bunch of build
> tests with the patch that I submitted, and nothing failed.

The external firmware has to be packaged before it can be included into
the kernel. And this is what the Makefile in firmware/ does. It
generates a *.gen.S for every firmware file in the CONFIG_EXTRA_FIRMWARE
list. For example:

markus@x4 linux % cat firmware/amd-ucode/microcode_amd.bin.gen.S
/* Generated by firmware/Makefile */
    .section .rodata
    .p2align 3
_fw_amd_ucode_microcode_amd_bin_bin:
    .incbin "/lib/firmware/amd-ucode/microcode_amd.bin"
_fw_end:
   .section .rodata.str,"aMS",@progbits,1
    .p2align 3
_fw_amd_ucode_microcode_amd_bin_name:
    .string "amd-ucode/microcode_amd.bin"
    .section .builtin_fw,"a",@progbits
    .p2align 3
    .quad _fw_amd_ucode_microcode_amd_bin_name
    .quad _fw_amd_ucode_microcode_amd_bin_bin
    .quad _fw_end - _fw_amd_ucode_microcode_amd_bin_bin

This is then used to assemble *.bin.gen.o object files and finally
firmware/built-in.o, that includes all firmware blobs.

Without the firmware/Makefile nothing gets build and therefore no
firmware gets included into the kernel. This may lead for example to a
failure to start X11, because the firmware for the graphic card doesn't
get loaded.

-- 
Markus

  reply	other threads:[~2017-09-16 17:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-09-15 18:56 [GIT PULL] Firmware files removal for 4.14-rc1 Greg KH
2017-09-16  4:51 ` Markus Trippelsdorf
2017-09-16  6:25   ` Markus Trippelsdorf
2017-09-16 16:55     ` Greg KH
2017-09-16 17:20       ` Markus Trippelsdorf [this message]
2017-09-16 17:53         ` Greg K-H
2017-09-16 17:56           ` Linus Torvalds

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170916172051.GB1846@x4 \
    --to=markus@trippelsdorf.de \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox