From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraju@codeaurora.org>,
josh@joshtriplett.org, mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com,
jiangshanlai@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
sramana@codeaurora.org, prsood@codeaurora.org,
pkondeti@codeaurora.org, markivx@codeaurora.org,
peterz@infradead.org
Subject: Re: Query regarding synchronize_sched_expedited and resched_cpu
Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2017 08:31:26 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170919153126.GA2955@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170918162412.GM3521@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 09:24:12AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 12:12:13PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > On Mon, 18 Sep 2017 09:01:25 -0700
> > "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> > > sched: Make resched_cpu() unconditional
> > >
> > > The current implementation of synchronize_sched_expedited() incorrectly
> > > assumes that resched_cpu() is unconditional, which it is not. This means
> > > that synchronize_sched_expedited() can hang when resched_cpu()'s trylock
> > > fails as follows (analysis by Neeraj Upadhyay):
> > >
> > > o CPU1 is waiting for expedited wait to complete:
> > > sync_rcu_exp_select_cpus
> > > rdp->exp_dynticks_snap & 0x1 // returns 1 for CPU5
> > > IPI sent to CPU5
> > >
> > > synchronize_sched_expedited_wait
> > > ret = swait_event_timeout(
> > > rsp->expedited_wq,
> > > sync_rcu_preempt_exp_done(rnp_root),
> > > jiffies_stall);
> > >
> > > expmask = 0x20 , and CPU 5 is in idle path (in cpuidle_enter())
> > >
> > > o CPU5 handles IPI and fails to acquire rq lock.
> > >
> > > Handles IPI
> > > sync_sched_exp_handler
> > > resched_cpu
> > > returns while failing to try lock acquire rq->lock
> > > need_resched is not set
> > >
> > > o CPU5 calls rcu_idle_enter() and as need_resched is not set, goes to
> > > idle (schedule() is not called).
> > >
> > > o CPU 1 reports RCU stall.
> > >
> > > Given that resched_cpu() is used only by RCU, this commit fixes the
> > > assumption by making resched_cpu() unconditional.
> >
> > Probably want to run this with several workloads with lockdep enabled
> > first.
>
> As soon as I work through the backlog of lockdep complaints that
> appeared in the last merge window... :-(
And this patch survived all rcutorture scenarios, including those with
lockdep enabled. There were failures, but these are pre-existing issues
I am chasing: Lost timeouts on TREE01 and rt_mutex trying to awaken
an offline CPU in TREE03.
So I have this one queued. Objections?
Thanx, Paul
------------------------------------------------------------------------
commit bc43e2e7e08134e6f403ac845edcf4f85668d803
Author: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Mon Sep 18 08:54:40 2017 -0700
sched: Make resched_cpu() unconditional
The current implementation of synchronize_sched_expedited() incorrectly
assumes that resched_cpu() is unconditional, which it is not. This means
that synchronize_sched_expedited() can hang when resched_cpu()'s trylock
fails as follows (analysis by Neeraj Upadhyay):
o CPU1 is waiting for expedited wait to complete:
sync_rcu_exp_select_cpus
rdp->exp_dynticks_snap & 0x1 // returns 1 for CPU5
IPI sent to CPU5
synchronize_sched_expedited_wait
ret = swait_event_timeout(
rsp->expedited_wq,
sync_rcu_preempt_exp_done(rnp_root),
jiffies_stall);
expmask = 0x20 , and CPU 5 is in idle path (in cpuidle_enter())
o CPU5 handles IPI and fails to acquire rq lock.
Handles IPI
sync_sched_exp_handler
resched_cpu
returns while failing to try lock acquire rq->lock
need_resched is not set
o CPU5 calls rcu_idle_enter() and as need_resched is not set, goes to
idle (schedule() is not called).
o CPU 1 reports RCU stall.
Given that resched_cpu() is used only by RCU, this commit fixes the
assumption by making resched_cpu() unconditional.
Reported-by: Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraju@codeaurora.org>
Suggested-by: Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraju@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index cab8c5ec128e..b2281971894c 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -505,8 +505,7 @@ void resched_cpu(int cpu)
struct rq *rq = cpu_rq(cpu);
unsigned long flags;
- if (!raw_spin_trylock_irqsave(&rq->lock, flags))
- return;
+ raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&rq->lock, flags);
resched_curr(rq);
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rq->lock, flags);
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-09-19 15:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-09-15 11:14 Query regarding synchronize_sched_expedited and resched_cpu Neeraj Upadhyay
2017-09-17 1:00 ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-09-17 6:07 ` Neeraj Upadhyay
2017-09-18 15:11 ` Steven Rostedt
2017-09-18 16:01 ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-09-18 16:12 ` Steven Rostedt
2017-09-18 16:24 ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-09-18 16:29 ` Steven Rostedt
2017-09-18 16:55 ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-09-18 23:53 ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-09-19 1:23 ` Steven Rostedt
2017-09-19 2:26 ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-09-19 1:50 ` Byungchul Park
2017-09-19 2:06 ` Byungchul Park
2017-09-19 2:33 ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-09-19 2:48 ` Byungchul Park
2017-09-19 4:04 ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-09-19 5:37 ` Boqun Feng
2017-09-19 6:11 ` Mike Galbraith
2017-09-19 6:53 ` Byungchul Park
2017-09-19 13:40 ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-09-21 13:57 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-09-21 15:33 ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-09-19 1:55 ` Byungchul Park
2017-09-19 15:31 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2017-09-19 15:58 ` Steven Rostedt
2017-09-19 16:12 ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-09-21 13:59 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-09-21 16:00 ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-09-21 16:30 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-09-21 16:47 ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-09-21 13:55 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-09-21 15:31 ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-09-21 16:18 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-09-21 15:46 ` Steven Rostedt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170919153126.GA2955@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=markivx@codeaurora.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=neeraju@codeaurora.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=pkondeti@codeaurora.org \
--cc=prsood@codeaurora.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=sramana@codeaurora.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).