From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1751819AbdIUOq5 (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Thu, 21 Sep 2017 10:46:57 -0400
Received: from szxga05-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.191]:6538 "EHLO
        szxga05-in.huawei.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S1751387AbdIUOqy (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Thu, 21 Sep 2017 10:46:54 -0400
Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2017 15:46:21 +0100
From: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
To: Icenowy Zheng <icenowy@aosc.io>
CC: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>,
        Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>,
        Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>,
        "Lee Jones" <lee.jones@linaro.org>,
        Quentin Schulz <quentin.schulz@free-electrons.com>,
        <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
        <linux-iio@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        <linux-sunxi@googlegroups.com>, <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/7] AXP803 AC/Battery support
Message-ID: <20170921154621.0000328d@huawei.com>
In-Reply-To: <20170920151814.22461-1-icenowy@aosc.io>
References: <20170920151814.22461-1-icenowy@aosc.io>
Organization: Huawei
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.15.0 (GTK+ 2.24.31; x86_64-w64-mingw32)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Originating-IP: [10.206.48.115]
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
X-Mirapoint-Virus-RAPID-Raw: score=unknown(0),
        refid=str=0001.0A020201.59C3D0D3.0058,ss=1,re=0.000,recu=0.000,reip=0.000,cl=1,cld=1,fgs=0,
        ip=0.0.0.0,
        so=2014-11-16 11:51:01,
        dmn=2013-03-21 17:37:32
X-Mirapoint-Loop-Id: 45ae5d313cc1ccfada3cb2743d239cd3
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Wed, 20 Sep 2017 23:18:07 +0800
Icenowy Zheng <icenowy@aosc.io> wrote:

> The AXP803 PMIC, used by most Allwinner A64 boards, features 3 power inputs:
> AC, USB and Battery.
> 
> This patchset adds support for the AC and Battery supplies, which is useful
> for the boards from Pine64 (Pine64, SoPine w/ baseboard model A, Pinebook).
> 
> The USB supply is not yet supported in this patchset because it's not
> present on Pine series boards.
> 
> In order to enable battery monitoring the ADC for battery is also enabled
> for AXs.
> 
> In order to enable battery monitoring the ADC for battery is also enabled
> for AXP803.

I'll go with the obvious question...

Why an RFC rather than a standard patch submission? I'm not immediately
seeing what is controversial!

Jonathan

> 
> Icenowy Zheng (7):
>   dt-bindings: add compatibles for AXP803 Battery/USB power supplies
>   iio: adc: axp20x-adc: allow to skip ADC rate setup now
>   iio: adc: axp20x-adc: add support for AXP803
>   power: supply: axp20x-battery: support AXP803
>   mfd: axp20x: add cells for AXP803 ADC/AC Power/Battery
>   arm64: allwinner: a64: add power supply nodes in AXP803 DTSI
>   arm64: allwinner: a64: enable AC and Battery for Pine64
> 
>  .../bindings/power/supply/axp20x_battery.txt       |   1 +
>  .../bindings/power/supply/axp20x_usb_power.txt     |   1 +
>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/axp803.dtsi          |  15 +++
>  .../arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-a64-pine64.dts |   8 ++
>  drivers/iio/adc/axp20x_adc.c                       | 114 ++++++++++++++++++++-
>  drivers/mfd/axp20x.c                               |  11 ++
>  drivers/power/supply/axp20x_battery.c              |  88 ++++++++++++++--
>  7 files changed, 226 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>