Re: [PATCH 4.13 015/109] pinctrl/amd: save pin registers over suspend/resume

Linus Walleij
2017-09-27T13:49:08Z

On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 1:29 PM, Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com> wrote:
> On Wed 2017-09-27 10:39:26, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 04:07:45PM +0200, Petr Mladek wrote:
>> > On Sun 2017-09-24 22:32:36, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>> > > 4.13-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
>> > >
>> > > ------------------
>> > >
>> > > From: Daniel Drake <drake@endlessm.com>
>> > >
>> > > commit 79d2c8bede2c93f9432d7da0bc2f76a195c90fc0 upstream.
>> > >
>> > > The touchpad in the Asus laptop models X505BA/BP and X542BA/BP is
>> > > unresponsive after suspend/resume. The following error appears during
>> > > resume:
>> > >
>> > > i2c_hid i2c-ELAN1300:00: failed to reset device.
>> > >
>> > > The problem here is that i2c_hid does not notice the interrupt being
>> > > generated at this point, because the GPIO is no longer configured
>> > > for interrupts.
>> > >
>> > > Fix this by saving pinctrl-amd pin registers during suspend and
>> > > restoring them at resume time.
>> > >
>> > > Based on code from pinctrl-intel.
>> > >
>> > > Signed-off-by: Daniel Drake <drake@endlessm.com>
>> > > Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
>> > > Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
>> > >
>> > > --- a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-amd.c
>> > > +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-amd.c
>> > > @@ -725,6 +726,69 @@ static const struct pinconf_ops amd_pinc
>> > > .pin_config_group_set = amd_pinconf_group_set,
>> > > };
>> > >
>> > > +#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
>> > > +static bool amd_gpio_should_save(struct amd_gpio *gpio_dev, unsigned int pin)
>> > > +{
>> > > + const struct pin_desc *pd = pin_desc_get(gpio_dev->pctrl, pin);
>> > > +
>> > > + if (!pd)
>> > > + return false;
>> > > +
>> > > + /*
>> > > + * Only restore the pin if it is actually in use by the kernel (or
>> > > + * by userspace).
>> > > + */
>> > > + if (pd->mux_owner || pd->gpio_owner ||
>> >
>> > This code causes a compilation error in the current Linus' tree
>> > (4.14-rc2+). I guess that the same problem will be also in
>> > older trees.
>> >
>> > IMHO, we need to select CONFIG_PINMUX for when CONFIG_PINCTRL_AMD
>> > is selected. The following patch helped here:
>> >
>> > >From f83130d3b5c147b4d400922847ca2751d8020ab5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> > From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
>> > Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2017 15:51:28 +0200
>> > Subject: [PATCH] pinctrl/amd: Fix build dependency on pinmux code
>> > MIME-Version: 1.0
>> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
>> > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
>> >
>> > The commit 79d2c8bede2c93f943 ("pinctrl/amd: save pin registers over
>> > suspend/resume") caused the following compilation errors:
>> >
>> > drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-amd.c: In function ‘amd_gpio_should_save’:
>> > drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-amd.c:741:8: error: ‘const struct pin_desc’ has no member named ‘mux_owner’
>> > if (pd->mux_owner || pd->gpio_owner ||
>> > ^
>> > drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-amd.c:741:25: error: ‘const struct pin_desc’ has no member named ‘gpio_owner’
>> > if (pd->mux_owner || pd->gpio_owner ||
>> >
>> > We need to enable CONFIG_PINMUX for this driver as well.
>> >
>> > Fixes: 79d2c8bede2c93f943 ("pinctrl/amd: save pin registers over suspend/resume")
>> > Signed-off-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
>> > ---
>> > drivers/pinctrl/Kconfig | 1 +
>> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>> >
>> > diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/Kconfig b/drivers/pinctrl/Kconfig
>> > index 1778cf4f81c7..82cd8b08d71f 100644
>> > --- a/drivers/pinctrl/Kconfig
>> > +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/Kconfig
>> > @@ -100,6 +100,7 @@ config PINCTRL_AMD
>> > tristate "AMD GPIO pin control"
>> > depends on GPIOLIB
>> > select GPIOLIB_IRQCHIP
>> > + select PINMUX
>> > select PINCONF
>> > select GENERIC_PINCONF
>> > help
>> > --
>> > 1.8.5.6
>>
>> What is the commit id for this patch in Linus's tree? I don't see it
>> there...
>
> This extra patch has not been pushed to the Linus' tree yet.
> It was only my proposal to fix the problem. I did not find
> the original patch discussed on the kernel mailing list.
> Therefore I sent this follow up fix as a reply to
> the 4.13-stable review mail.
>
> I hope that Linus Walleij would notice, review, and push it
> into Linus' tree.

I missed it. OK looking for it so I can apply it.

Yours,
Linus Walleij