Re: [PATCH 1/4] pid: Replace pid bitmap implementation with IDR API

[Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>]

On 09/25, Gargi Sharma wrote:
>
>  void zap_pid_ns_processes(struct pid_namespace *pid_ns)
>  {
> -	int nr;
> +	int nr = 2;
>  	int rc;
>  	struct task_struct *task, *me = current;
>  	int init_pids = thread_group_leader(me) ? 1 : 2;
> +	struct pid *pid;
>  
>  	/* Don't allow any more processes into the pid namespace */
>  	disable_pid_allocation(pid_ns);
> @@ -240,8 +230,8 @@ void zap_pid_ns_processes(struct pid_namespace *pid_ns)
>  	 *
>  	 */
>  	read_lock(&tasklist_lock);
> -	nr = next_pidmap(pid_ns, 1);
> -	while (nr > 0) {
> +	pid = idr_get_next(&pid_ns->idr, &nr);
> +	while (pid) {
>  		rcu_read_lock();
>  
>  		task = pid_task(find_vpid(nr), PIDTYPE_PID);
> @@ -250,7 +240,8 @@ void zap_pid_ns_processes(struct pid_namespace *pid_ns)
>  
>  		rcu_read_unlock();
>  
> -		nr = next_pidmap(pid_ns, nr);
> +		nr++;
> +		pid = idr_get_next(&pid_ns->idr, &nr);
>  	}
>  	read_unlock(&tasklist_lock);

Then you should probably rewrite this code using idr_for_each_entry_continue() ?

And why do you need find_vpid(nr) if you already have "pid" ?

Oleg.