public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>,
	linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>,
	dm-devel@redhat.com
Cc: Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@sandisk.com>,
	Laurence Oberman <loberman@redhat.com>,
	Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@linaro.org>,
	Oleksandr Natalenko <oleksandr@natalenko.name>,
	Tom Nguyen <tom81094@gmail.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
	Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 00/14] blk-mq-sched: improve sequential I/O performance(part 1)
Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2017 18:32:12 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170930103211.GA29093@ming.t460p> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170930102720.30219-1-ming.lei@redhat.com>

On Sat, Sep 30, 2017 at 06:27:13PM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> Hi Jens,
> 
> In Red Hat internal storage test wrt. blk-mq scheduler, we
> found that I/O performance is much bad with mq-deadline, especially
> about sequential I/O on some multi-queue SCSI devcies(lpfc, qla2xxx,
> SRP...)
> 
> Turns out one big issue causes the performance regression: requests
> are still dequeued from sw queue/scheduler queue even when ldd's
> queue is busy, so I/O merge becomes quite difficult to make, then
> sequential IO degrades a lot.
> 
> This issue becomes one of mains reasons for reverting default SCSI_MQ
> in V4.13.
> 
> The 1st patch takes direct issue in blk_mq_request_bypass_insert(),
> then we can improve dm-mpath's performance in part 2, which will
> be posted out soon.
> 
> The 2nd six patches improve this situation, and brings back
> some performance loss.
> 
> With this change, SCSI-MQ sequential I/O performance is
> improved much, Paolo reported that mq-deadline performance
> improved much[2] in his dbench test wrt V2. Also performanc
> improvement on lpfc/qla2xx was observed with V1.[1]
> 
> Please consider it for V4.15.
> 
> [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-block&m=150151989915776&w=2
> [2] https://marc.info/?l=linux-block&m=150217980602843&w=2
> 
> V5:
> 	- address some comments from Omar
> 	- add Tested-by & Reveiewed-by tag
> 	- use direct issue for blk_mq_request_bypass_insert(), and
> 	start to consider to improve sequential I/O for dm-mpath
> 	- only include part 1(the original patch 1 ~ 6), as suggested
> 	by Omar
> 
> V4:
> 	- add Reviewed-by tag
> 	- some trival change: typo fix in commit log or comment,
> 	variable name, no actual functional change
> 
> V3:
> 	- totally round robin for picking req from ctx, as suggested
> 	by Bart
> 	- remove one local variable in __sbitmap_for_each_set()
> 	- drop patches of single dispatch list, which can improve
> 	performance on mq-deadline, but cause a bit degrade on
> 	none because all hctxs need to be checked after ->dispatch
> 	is flushed. Will post it again once it is mature.
> 	- rebase on v4.13-rc6 with block for-next
> 
> V2:
> 	- dequeue request from sw queues in round roubin's style
> 	as suggested by Bart, and introduces one helper in sbitmap
> 	for this purpose
> 	- improve bio merge via hash table from sw queue
> 	- add comments about using DISPATCH_BUSY state in lockless way,
> 	simplifying handling on busy state,
> 	- hold ctx->lock when clearing ctx busy bit as suggested
> 	by Bart
> 
> 
> Ming Lei (7):
>   blk-mq: issue rq directly in blk_mq_request_bypass_insert()
>   blk-mq-sched: fix scheduler bad performance
>   sbitmap: introduce __sbitmap_for_each_set()
>   blk-mq: introduce blk_mq_dequeue_from_ctx()
>   blk-mq-sched: move actual dispatching into one helper
>   blk-mq-sched: improve dispatching from sw queue
>   blk-mq-sched: don't dequeue request until all in ->dispatch are
>     flushed
> 
>  block/blk-core.c        |   3 +-
>  block/blk-mq-debugfs.c  |   1 +
>  block/blk-mq-sched.c    | 104 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
>  block/blk-mq.c          | 114 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
>  block/blk-mq.h          |   4 +-
>  drivers/md/dm-rq.c      |   2 +-
>  include/linux/blk-mq.h  |   3 ++
>  include/linux/sbitmap.h |  64 +++++++++++++++++++--------
>  8 files changed, 238 insertions(+), 57 deletions(-)

Oops, the title should have been:

[PATCH V5 0/7] blk-mq-sched: improve sequential I/O performance(part 1)

Sorry for that.

-- 
Ming

  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-09-30 10:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-09-30 10:27 [PATCH V5 00/14] blk-mq-sched: improve sequential I/O performance(part 1) Ming Lei
2017-09-30 10:27 ` [PATCH V5 1/7] blk-mq: issue rq directly in blk_mq_request_bypass_insert() Ming Lei
2017-10-03  8:58   ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-10-03 13:39     ` Ming Lei
2017-09-30 10:27 ` [PATCH V5 2/7] blk-mq-sched: fix scheduler bad performance Ming Lei
2017-10-02 14:19   ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-09-30 10:27 ` [PATCH V5 3/7] sbitmap: introduce __sbitmap_for_each_set() Ming Lei
2017-09-30 10:27 ` [PATCH V5 4/7] blk-mq: introduce blk_mq_dequeue_from_ctx() Ming Lei
2017-10-03  9:01   ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-10-09  4:36     ` Ming Lei
2017-09-30 10:27 ` [PATCH V5 5/7] blk-mq-sched: move actual dispatching into one helper Ming Lei
2017-10-02 14:19   ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-10-09  9:07     ` Ming Lei
2017-09-30 10:27 ` [PATCH V5 6/7] blk-mq-sched: improve dispatching from sw queue Ming Lei
2017-10-03  9:05   ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-10-09 10:15     ` Ming Lei
2017-09-30 10:27 ` [PATCH V5 7/7] blk-mq-sched: don't dequeue request until all in ->dispatch are flushed Ming Lei
2017-10-03  9:11   ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-10-09 10:40     ` Ming Lei
2017-09-30 10:32 ` Ming Lei [this message]
2017-10-09 12:09 ` [PATCH V5 00/14] blk-mq-sched: improve sequential I/O performance(part 1) John Garry
2017-10-09 15:04   ` Ming Lei
2017-10-10  1:46     ` Ming Lei
2017-10-10 12:24       ` John Garry
2017-10-10 12:34         ` Johannes Thumshirn
2017-10-10 12:37           ` Paolo Valente
2017-10-10 13:45         ` Ming Lei
2017-10-10 15:10           ` John Garry

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170930103211.GA29093@ming.t460p \
    --to=ming.lei@redhat.com \
    --cc=axboe@fb.com \
    --cc=bart.vanassche@sandisk.com \
    --cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=loberman@redhat.com \
    --cc=oleksandr@natalenko.name \
    --cc=osandov@fb.com \
    --cc=paolo.valente@linaro.org \
    --cc=snitzer@redhat.com \
    --cc=tom81094@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox