public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>,
	linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>,
	dm-devel@redhat.com
Cc: Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@sandisk.com>,
	Laurence Oberman <loberman@redhat.com>,
	Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@linaro.org>,
	Oleksandr Natalenko <oleksandr@natalenko.name>,
	Tom Nguyen <tom81094@gmail.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com>,
	Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH V5 8/8] blk-mq: improve bio merge from blk-mq sw queue
Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2017 19:26:55 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170930112655.31451-9-ming.lei@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170930112655.31451-1-ming.lei@redhat.com>

This patch uses hash table to do bio merge from sw queue,
then we can align to blk-mq scheduler/block legacy's way
for bio merge.

Turns out bio merge via hash table is more efficient than
simple merge on the last 8 requests in sw queue. On SCSI SRP,
it is observed ~10% IOPS is increased in sequential IO test
with this patch.

It is also one step forward to real 'none' scheduler, in which
way the blk-mq scheduler framework can be more clean.

Tested-by: Oleksandr Natalenko <oleksandr@natalenko.name>
Tested-by: Tom Nguyen <tom81094@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
---
 block/blk-mq-sched.c | 49 ++++++++++++-------------------------------------
 block/blk-mq.c       | 28 +++++++++++++++++++++++++---
 2 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

diff --git a/block/blk-mq-sched.c b/block/blk-mq-sched.c
index a58f4746317c..8262ae71e0cd 100644
--- a/block/blk-mq-sched.c
+++ b/block/blk-mq-sched.c
@@ -260,50 +260,25 @@ bool blk_mq_sched_try_merge(struct request_queue *q, struct bio *bio,
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(blk_mq_sched_try_merge);
 
-/*
- * Reverse check our software queue for entries that we could potentially
- * merge with. Currently includes a hand-wavy stop count of 8, to not spend
- * too much time checking for merges.
- */
-static bool blk_mq_attempt_merge(struct request_queue *q,
+static bool blk_mq_ctx_try_merge(struct request_queue *q,
 				 struct blk_mq_ctx *ctx, struct bio *bio)
 {
-	struct request *rq;
-	int checked = 8;
+	struct request *rq, *free = NULL;
+	enum elv_merge type;
+	bool merged;
 
 	lockdep_assert_held(&ctx->lock);
 
-	list_for_each_entry_reverse(rq, &ctx->rq_list, queuelist) {
-		bool merged = false;
-
-		if (!checked--)
-			break;
-
-		if (!blk_rq_merge_ok(rq, bio))
-			continue;
+	type = elv_merge_ctx(q, &rq, bio, ctx);
+	merged = __blk_mq_try_merge(q, bio, &free, rq, type);
 
-		switch (blk_try_merge(rq, bio)) {
-		case ELEVATOR_BACK_MERGE:
-			if (blk_mq_sched_allow_merge(q, rq, bio))
-				merged = bio_attempt_back_merge(q, rq, bio);
-			break;
-		case ELEVATOR_FRONT_MERGE:
-			if (blk_mq_sched_allow_merge(q, rq, bio))
-				merged = bio_attempt_front_merge(q, rq, bio);
-			break;
-		case ELEVATOR_DISCARD_MERGE:
-			merged = bio_attempt_discard_merge(q, rq, bio);
-			break;
-		default:
-			continue;
-		}
+	if (free)
+		blk_mq_free_request(free);
 
-		if (merged)
-			ctx->rq_merged++;
-		return merged;
-	}
+	if (merged)
+		ctx->rq_merged++;
 
-	return false;
+	return merged;
 }
 
 bool __blk_mq_sched_bio_merge(struct request_queue *q, struct bio *bio)
@@ -321,7 +296,7 @@ bool __blk_mq_sched_bio_merge(struct request_queue *q, struct bio *bio)
 	if (hctx->flags & BLK_MQ_F_SHOULD_MERGE) {
 		/* default per sw-queue merge */
 		spin_lock(&ctx->lock);
-		ret = blk_mq_attempt_merge(q, ctx, bio);
+		ret = blk_mq_ctx_try_merge(q, ctx, bio);
 		spin_unlock(&ctx->lock);
 	}
 
diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c
index 561a663cdd0e..9a3a561a63b5 100644
--- a/block/blk-mq.c
+++ b/block/blk-mq.c
@@ -849,6 +849,18 @@ static void blk_mq_timeout_work(struct work_struct *work)
 	blk_queue_exit(q);
 }
 
+static void blk_mq_ctx_remove_rq_list(struct blk_mq_ctx *ctx,
+		struct list_head *head)
+{
+	struct request *rq;
+
+	lockdep_assert_held(&ctx->lock);
+
+	list_for_each_entry(rq, head, queuelist)
+		rqhash_del(rq);
+	ctx->last_merge = NULL;
+}
+
 struct flush_busy_ctx_data {
 	struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx;
 	struct list_head *list;
@@ -863,6 +875,7 @@ static bool flush_busy_ctx(struct sbitmap *sb, unsigned int bitnr, void *data)
 	sbitmap_clear_bit(sb, bitnr);
 	spin_lock(&ctx->lock);
 	list_splice_tail_init(&ctx->rq_list, flush_data->list);
+	blk_mq_ctx_remove_rq_list(ctx, flush_data->list);
 	spin_unlock(&ctx->lock);
 	return true;
 }
@@ -892,17 +905,23 @@ static bool dispatch_rq_from_ctx(struct sbitmap *sb, unsigned int bitnr, void *d
 	struct dispatch_rq_data *dispatch_data = data;
 	struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx = dispatch_data->hctx;
 	struct blk_mq_ctx *ctx = hctx->ctxs[bitnr];
+	struct request *rq = NULL;
 
 	spin_lock(&ctx->lock);
 	if (unlikely(!list_empty(&ctx->rq_list))) {
-		dispatch_data->rq = list_entry_rq(ctx->rq_list.next);
-		list_del_init(&dispatch_data->rq->queuelist);
+		rq = list_entry_rq(ctx->rq_list.next);
+		list_del_init(&rq->queuelist);
+		rqhash_del(rq);
 		if (list_empty(&ctx->rq_list))
 			sbitmap_clear_bit(sb, bitnr);
 	}
+	if (ctx->last_merge == rq)
+		ctx->last_merge = NULL;
 	spin_unlock(&ctx->lock);
 
-	return !dispatch_data->rq;
+	dispatch_data->rq = rq;
+
+	return !rq;
 }
 
 struct request *blk_mq_dequeue_from_ctx(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx,
@@ -1433,6 +1452,8 @@ static inline void __blk_mq_insert_req_list(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx,
 		list_add(&rq->queuelist, &ctx->rq_list);
 	else
 		list_add_tail(&rq->queuelist, &ctx->rq_list);
+
+	rqhash_add(ctx->hash, rq);
 }
 
 void __blk_mq_insert_request(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx, struct request *rq,
@@ -1968,6 +1989,7 @@ static int blk_mq_hctx_notify_dead(unsigned int cpu, struct hlist_node *node)
 	spin_lock(&ctx->lock);
 	if (!list_empty(&ctx->rq_list)) {
 		list_splice_init(&ctx->rq_list, &tmp);
+		blk_mq_ctx_remove_rq_list(ctx, &tmp);
 		blk_mq_hctx_clear_pending(hctx, ctx);
 	}
 	spin_unlock(&ctx->lock);
-- 
2.9.5

  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-09-30 11:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-09-30 11:26 [PATCH V5 0/8] blk-mq: improve bio merge for none scheduler Ming Lei
2017-09-30 11:26 ` [PATCH V5 1/8] blk-mq-sched: introduce blk_mq_sched_queue_depth() Ming Lei
2017-09-30 11:26 ` [PATCH V5 2/8] blk-mq-sched: use q->queue_depth as hint for q->nr_requests Ming Lei
2017-09-30 11:26 ` [PATCH V5 3/8] block: introduce rqhash helpers Ming Lei
2017-10-03  9:15   ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-09-30 11:26 ` [PATCH V5 4/8] block: move actual bio merge code into __elv_merge Ming Lei
2017-10-03  9:16   ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-09-30 11:26 ` [PATCH V5 5/8] block: add check on elevator for supporting bio merge via hashtable from blk-mq sw queue Ming Lei
2017-10-03  9:17   ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-09-30 11:26 ` [PATCH V5 6/8] block: introduce .last_merge and .hash to blk_mq_ctx Ming Lei
2017-10-03  9:19   ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-09-30 11:26 ` [PATCH V5 7/8] blk-mq-sched: refactor blk_mq_sched_try_merge() Ming Lei
2017-10-03  9:20   ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-09-30 11:26 ` Ming Lei [this message]
2017-10-03  9:21   ` [PATCH V5 8/8] blk-mq: improve bio merge from blk-mq sw queue Christoph Hellwig
2017-10-09  4:28     ` Ming Lei

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170930112655.31451-9-ming.lei@redhat.com \
    --to=ming.lei@redhat.com \
    --cc=axboe@fb.com \
    --cc=bart.vanassche@sandisk.com \
    --cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=loberman@redhat.com \
    --cc=oleksandr@natalenko.name \
    --cc=osandov@fb.com \
    --cc=paolo.valente@linaro.org \
    --cc=snitzer@redhat.com \
    --cc=tom81094@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox