From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
To: kan.liang@intel.com
Cc: acme@kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org, mingo@redhat.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jolsa@kernel.org,
namhyung@kernel.org, adrian.hunter@intel.com,
lukasz.odzioba@intel.com, wangnan0@huawei.com,
hekuang@huawei.com, ast@kernel.org, ak@linux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC V4 5/6] perf top: switch to backward overwrite mode
Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2017 21:48:44 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170930194844.GA7196@krava> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1506696477-146932-6-git-send-email-kan.liang@intel.com>
On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 07:47:56AM -0700, kan.liang@intel.com wrote:
> From: Kan Liang <kan.liang@intel.com>
>
> perf_top__mmap_read has severe performance issue in
> Knights Landing/Mill, when monitoring in heavy load system. It costs
> several minutes to finish, which is unacceptable.
>
> perf top was overwrite mode. But it is changed to non overwrite mode
> since commit 93fc64f14472 ("perf top: Switch to non overwrite mode").
> For non overwrite mode, it tries to read everything in the ring buffer
> and does not check the messup. Once there are lots of samples delivered
> shortly, the processing time could be very long.
> Knights Landing/Mill as a manycore processor contains a large number of
> small cores. Because of the huge core number, it will generated lots of
> samples in a heavy load system. Also, since the huge sample#, the mmap
> writer probably bite the tail and mess up the samples.
>
> Also, to avoid the problems which is described in
> commit 9ecda41acb97 ("perf/core: Add ::write_backward attribute to perf
> event"), switch to backward overwrite mode.
> Pausing the ring-buffer during perf_top__mmap_read to ensure the
> ring-buffer is stable.
> There would be some records lost in backward overwrite mode. Removing
> the lost events checking.
I'm getting perf top hogging the cpu completely with this change
jirka
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-09-30 19:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-09-29 14:47 [PATCH RFC V4 0/6] perf top optimization kan.liang
2017-09-29 14:47 ` [PATCH RFC V4 1/6] perf tools: lock to protect namespaces and comm list kan.liang
2017-10-02 18:05 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2017-10-02 19:14 ` Liang, Kan
2017-10-02 19:34 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2017-10-03 16:44 ` [tip:perf/core] perf tools: Lock " tip-bot for Kan Liang
2017-09-29 14:47 ` [PATCH RFC V4 2/6] perf tools: lock to protect comm_str rb tree kan.liang
2017-10-03 16:45 ` [tip:perf/core] perf tools: Lock " tip-bot for Kan Liang
2017-09-29 14:47 ` [PATCH RFC V4 3/6] perf top: implement multithreading for perf_event__synthesize_threads kan.liang
2017-10-03 16:45 ` [tip:perf/core] perf top: Implement " tip-bot for Kan Liang
2017-09-29 14:47 ` [PATCH RFC V4 4/6] perf top: add option to set the number of thread for event synthesize kan.liang
2017-10-03 16:45 ` [tip:perf/core] perf top: Add " tip-bot for Kan Liang
2017-09-29 14:47 ` [PATCH RFC V4 5/6] perf top: switch to backward overwrite mode kan.liang
2017-09-30 19:48 ` Jiri Olsa [this message]
2017-10-02 17:19 ` Liang, Kan
2017-10-02 18:03 ` acme
2017-10-03 8:24 ` Jiri Olsa
2017-09-29 14:47 ` [PATCH RFC V4 6/6] perf top: check the cost of perf_top__mmap_read kan.liang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170930194844.GA7196@krava \
--to=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=hekuang@huawei.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kan.liang@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lukasz.odzioba@intel.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=wangnan0@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox