From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1751805AbdJBNpK (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Mon, 2 Oct 2017 09:45:10 -0400
Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([65.50.211.133]:36807 "EHLO
        bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S1751727AbdJBNpG (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Mon, 2 Oct 2017 09:45:06 -0400
Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2017 06:45:04 -0700
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
        "Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
        "James E . J . Bottomley" <jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@sandisk.com>,
        Oleksandr Natalenko <oleksandr@natalenko.name>,
        Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@suse.de>,
        Cathy Avery <cavery@redhat.com>,
        Martin Steigerwald <martin@lichtvoll.de>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.com>,
        Bart Van Assche <Bart.VanAssche@wdc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V7 4/6] block: prepare for passing RQF_PREEMPT to request
 allocation
Message-ID: <20171002134504.GD19119@infradead.org>
References: <20170930061214.10622-1-ming.lei@redhat.com>
 <20170930061214.10622-5-ming.lei@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20170930061214.10622-5-ming.lei@redhat.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.8.3 (2017-05-23)
X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from <hch@infradead.org> by bombadil.infradead.org. See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

As mentioned in the reply to Bart, I'd much rather use BLK_MQ_REQ_*
for the sane blk_get_request version (which should have the same
prototype as blk_mq_alloc_request) instead of having another flags
namespace.