From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
To: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Cc: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
"Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@infradead.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, LKP <lkp@01.org>
Subject: Re: [lockdep] b09be676e0 BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 000001f2
Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2017 09:31:47 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171003143147.ypotpg4f3dql4gtf@treble> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171003140634.r2jzujgl62ox4uzh@wfg-t540p.sh.intel.com>
On Tue, Oct 03, 2017 at 10:06:34PM +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote:
> Hi Byungchul,
>
> This patch triggers a NULL-dereference bug at update_stack_state().
> Although its parent commit also has a NULL-dereference bug, however
> the call stack looks rather different. Both dmesg files are attached.
>
> It also triggers this warning, which is being discussed in another
> thread, so CC Josh. The full dmesg attached, too.
>
> Please press Enter to activate this console.
> [ 138.605622] WARNING: kernel stack regs at be299c9a in procd:340 has bad 'bp' value 000001be
> [ 138.605627] unwind stack type:0 next_sp: (null) mask:0x2 graph_idx:0
> [ 138.605631] be299c9a: 299ceb00 (0x299ceb00)
> [ 138.605633] be299c9e: 2281f1be (0x2281f1be)
> [ 138.605634] be299ca2: 299cebb6 (0x299cebb6)
I suspect the bug is in:
ce07a9415f26 ("locking/lockdep: Make check_prev_add() able to handle external stack_trace")
It converts the stack-allocated stack_trace struct from static to
non-static, yet still adds it to a list. Does this fix it?
diff --git a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
index 44c8d0d17170..b4a5e60488aa 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
@@ -1986,7 +1986,7 @@ check_prevs_add(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *next)
{
int depth = curr->lockdep_depth;
struct held_lock *hlock;
- struct stack_trace trace;
+ static struct stack_trace trace;
int (*save)(struct stack_trace *trace) = save_trace;
/*
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-10-03 14:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-10-03 14:06 [lockdep] b09be676e0 BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 000001f2 Fengguang Wu
2017-10-03 14:31 ` Josh Poimboeuf [this message]
2017-10-03 14:41 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-10-03 15:05 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-10-03 16:28 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-10-03 17:34 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-10-03 21:44 ` Tetsuo Handa
2017-10-04 21:06 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-10-04 21:30 ` Linus Torvalds
2017-10-04 22:15 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-10-04 22:40 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-10-05 11:02 ` Tetsuo Handa
2017-10-05 13:57 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-10-04 8:34 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-10-10 5:57 ` Byungchul Park
2017-10-03 16:54 ` Linus Torvalds
2017-10-03 16:57 ` Linus Torvalds
2017-10-10 5:48 ` Byungchul Park
2017-10-10 16:22 ` Linus Torvalds
2017-10-10 16:56 ` Linus Torvalds
2017-10-10 18:14 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-10-10 18:38 ` Linus Torvalds
2017-10-11 1:14 ` Byungchul Park
2017-10-11 2:36 ` Byungchul Park
2017-10-11 0:56 ` Byungchul Park
2017-10-11 1:02 ` Byungchul Park
2017-10-12 1:15 ` Byungchul Park
2017-10-03 17:18 ` Ingo Molnar
2017-10-04 9:20 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-10-04 10:31 ` Ingo Molnar
2017-10-04 14:15 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-10-10 5:30 ` Byungchul Park
2017-10-05 13:01 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-10-05 14:54 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-10-09 10:50 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-10-09 12:21 ` Fengguang Wu
2017-10-09 12:54 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-10-09 12:59 ` Fengguang Wu
2017-10-09 13:03 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-10-09 12:55 ` Fengguang Wu
2017-10-09 13:26 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-10-09 14:17 ` Fengguang Wu
2017-10-09 15:28 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-10-09 15:41 ` Fengguang Wu
2017-10-09 15:44 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-10-09 15:47 ` Fengguang Wu
2017-10-10 5:08 ` Byungchul Park
2017-10-12 8:47 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-10-12 9:21 ` Fengguang Wu
2017-10-12 9:28 ` Fengguang Wu
2017-10-12 11:45 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20171003143147.ypotpg4f3dql4gtf@treble \
--to=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
--cc=byungchul.park@lge.com \
--cc=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lkp@01.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox