public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
To: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Cc: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>,
	Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
	Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@arm.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] bus: CCN/CCI: Fix use of smp_processor_id()
Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2017 18:18:47 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171003171847.GG4931@leverpostej> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171003171413.18592-1-marc.zyngier@arm.com>

On Tue, Oct 03, 2017 at 06:14:11PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> I've just noticed that both the CCI and CCN drivers have a small
> buglet in that they call smp_processor_id() from preemptible context,
> which is frown upon (having just booted a 4.13 kernel with
> DEBUG_PREEMPT on my Seattle, I was surprised to be greeted with a nice
> backtrace...).
> 
> I've tested the CCN patch on the same Seatle box, but I've only
> compile-tested the equivalent CCI patch (which is obviously correct --
> famous last words...).
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> 	M.
> 
> * From v1: Keep the current CPU refcount until we have registered the
>   CPU notifiers, making sure we don't race against a surprise hotplug
>   off.
> 
> Marc Zyngier (2):
>   bus: arm-ccn: Fix use of smp_processor_id() in preemptible context
>   bus: arm-cci: Fix use of smp_processor_id() in preemptible context

For both:

Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>

Thanks,
Mark.

      parent reply	other threads:[~2017-10-03 17:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-10-03 17:14 [PATCH v2 0/2] bus: CCN/CCI: Fix use of smp_processor_id() Marc Zyngier
2017-10-03 17:14 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] bus: arm-ccn: Fix use of smp_processor_id() in preemptible context Marc Zyngier
2017-10-04 11:26   ` Pawel Moll
2017-10-04 12:32     ` Marc Zyngier
2017-10-04 12:33       ` Pawel Moll
2017-10-03 17:14 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] bus: arm-cci: " Marc Zyngier
2017-10-03 17:18 ` Mark Rutland [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20171003171847.GG4931@leverpostej \
    --to=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
    --cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
    --cc=pawel.moll@arm.com \
    --cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox