From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Cc: mingo@redhat.com, x86@kernel.org,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
"Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@fb.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [BUGFIX PATCH] kprobes/x86: Remove IRQ disabling from jprobe handlers
Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2017 12:41:01 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171004104101.nhtsotudcrh4d354@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171004151830.1e460cb7250b8741af0e2dbc@kernel.org>
* Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org> wrote:
> Hmm, actually we can not disable jprobe, that has no separate Kconfig.
> So we need to introduce new kconfig for that.
>
> And, there are several network protocols using jprobe to trace events.
> (e.g. NET_DCCPPROBE and NET_TCPPROBE)
> I think they need to migrate to trace-event at first.
>
> So, how about below idea?
>
> 1. Introduce CONFIG_JPROBE_API which only separate jprobe general parts
> (no arch dependent code involves) and make it default n.
> 2. Mark break_handler and jprobe APIs deprecated so that no new user comes up.
> 3. migrate in-kernel jprobe user to trace-event or ftrace.
> (may take some time)
So my suggestion would be to just return from register_jprobe() and don't register
anything. Yes, there are usecases of jprobes in the kernel, but they all look
pretty ancient and unused.
So let's try this for -next and see whether anyone has a real usecase. And no
Kconfig and deprecation messages - those don't really work in practice - just
disable the functionality and force people to (trivially) modify the source if
they want to re-enable it.
If this is fine for a single release then we can just remove it all:
> 4. after that, we can completely remove jprobe which will be a series for
> all archs. (or just one big patch?)
we want a series of patches - but that's for later.
Thanks,
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-10-04 10:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-09-30 23:12 [kprobes/x86] a19b2e3d78: WARNING:at_kernel/locking/lockdep.c:#trace_hardirqs_off_caller kernel test robot
2017-10-02 7:33 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-10-02 15:46 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2017-10-02 16:05 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-10-03 1:10 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2017-10-02 16:19 ` Linus Torvalds
2017-10-03 2:26 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2017-10-03 7:18 ` [BUGFIX PATCH] kprobes/x86: Remove IRQ disabling from jprobe handlers Masami Hiramatsu
2017-10-03 9:33 ` Ingo Molnar
2017-10-03 15:24 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2017-10-03 17:11 ` Ingo Molnar
2017-10-04 6:18 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2017-10-04 10:41 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2017-10-04 14:08 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2017-10-05 7:57 ` Ingo Molnar
2017-10-05 8:28 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2017-10-03 17:43 ` [tip:x86/urgent] " tip-bot for Masami Hiramatsu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20171004104101.nhtsotudcrh4d354@gmail.com \
--to=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=ananth@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=ast@fb.com \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox