From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752001AbdJDKu4 (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Oct 2017 06:50:56 -0400 Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.25]:47237 "EHLO out1-smtp.messagingengine.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751440AbdJDKuz (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Oct 2017 06:50:55 -0400 X-ME-Sender: X-Sasl-enc: 2hH7DIGo8fQ8BpENAb/uoHYy24vVh6XIur3wX25ogqtW 1507114254 Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2017 21:50:51 +1100 From: "Tobin C. Harding" To: Greg KH Cc: Petr Mladek , Joe Perches , Ian Campbell , Sergey Senozhatsky , kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , Steven Rostedt , William Roberts , Chris Fries , Dave Weinstein Subject: Re: [kernel-hardening] [RFC V2 0/6] add more kernel pointer filter options Message-ID: <20171004105051.GE16685@eros> References: <1506816410-10230-1-git-send-email-me@tobin.cc> <20171004085850.GH28247@kroah.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20171004085850.GH28247@kroah.com> X-Mailer: Mutt 1.5.24 (2015-08-30) User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Oct 04, 2017 at 10:58:50AM +0200, Greg KH wrote: > On Sun, Oct 01, 2017 at 11:06:44AM +1100, Tobin C. Harding wrote: > > Version 2 of Greg's patch series with changes made as suggested by comments to V1. > > > > Applies on top of Linus' current development tree > > > > a8c964eacb21288b2dbfa9d80cee5968a3b8fb21 > > > > V1 cover letter: > > > > Here's a short patch series from Chris Fries and Dave Weinstein that > > implements some new restrictions when printing out kernel pointers, as > > well as the ability to whitelist kernel pointers where needed. > > > > These patches are based on work from William Roberts, and also are > > inspired by grsecurity's %pP to specifically whitelist a kernel pointer, > > where it is always needed, like the last patch in the series shows, in > > the UIO drivers (UIO requires that you know the address, it's a hardware > > address, nothing wrong with seeing that...) > > > > I haven't done much to this patch series, only forward porting it from > > an older kernel release (4.4) and a few minor tweaks. [snip] > > Nice! Thanks for doing this work, looks great to me. Care to resend > the next version as a "real" one (i.e. no RFC)? First thing tomorrow! Is correct protocol for me to add your Signed-off-by tag to each patch from this RFC? Or is the protocol for you to add the tag yourself when the real version is posted? I intend splitting one of the patches into two as suggested by Will. thanks, Tobin.