From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1752212AbdJFQUV (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Fri, 6 Oct 2017 12:20:21 -0400
Received: from mga05.intel.com ([192.55.52.43]:5668 "EHLO mga05.intel.com"
        rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
        id S1751491AbdJFQUU (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Fri, 6 Oct 2017 12:20:20 -0400
X-ExtLoop1: 1
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.42,484,1500966000"; 
   d="scan'208";a="135951745"
Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2017 09:22:55 -0700
From: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com>
To: Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
        iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        Rafael Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
        Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe.brucker@arm.com>,
        Lan Tianyu <tianyu.lan@intel.com>, jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 09/16] driver core: add iommu device fault reporting
 data
Message-ID: <20171006092255.403d26a0@jacob-builder>
In-Reply-To: <20171006083931.GY8398@8bytes.org>
References: <1507244624-39189-1-git-send-email-jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com>
        <1507244624-39189-10-git-send-email-jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com>
        <20171006071145.GA24354@infradead.org>
        <20171006083931.GY8398@8bytes.org>
Organization: OTC
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.13.2 (GTK+ 2.24.30; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Fri, 6 Oct 2017 10:39:31 +0200
Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org> wrote:

> On Fri, Oct 06, 2017 at 12:11:45AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > This is the 3rd iommu field, in addition to 8 dma-specific fields
> > that we carry around for each struct device.  
> 
> Agreed, consolidating the iommu-fields in 'struct device' into a
> single 'struct iommu_data' is on my todo-list.
> 
> Jacob, can you add that 'struct iommu_data' to 'struct device' and put
> your fault-data into it? We can then move on and migrate the other
> fields into that struct too.
> 
sounds good.