From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1754887AbdJIOnY (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Mon, 9 Oct 2017 10:43:24 -0400
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:36954 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com"
        rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
        id S1754374AbdJIOnW (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Mon, 9 Oct 2017 10:43:22 -0400
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mx1.redhat.com 245632CE971
Authentication-Results: ext-mx05.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com
Authentication-Results: ext-mx05.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; spf=fail smtp.mailfrom=jolsa@redhat.com
Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2017 16:43:19 +0200
From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
        Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>, Wang Nan <wangnan0@huawei.com>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
        He Kuang <hekuang@huawei.com>, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@fb.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] perf, tools: Don't force MetricExprs to lower case
Message-ID: <20171009144319.GC1561@krava>
References: <20170912195643.2611-1-andi@firstfloor.org>
 <20170912195643.2611-2-andi@firstfloor.org>
 <20171003160605.GC25388@kernel.org>
 <20171004103052.GC23759@krava>
 <20171004162711.GF2482@two.firstfloor.org>
 <20171009134151.GA15127@krava>
 <20171009140728.GG2482@two.firstfloor.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20171009140728.GG2482@two.firstfloor.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.1 (2017-09-22)
X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.29]); Mon, 09 Oct 2017 14:43:22 +0000 (UTC)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Mon, Oct 09, 2017 at 07:07:29AM -0700, Andi Kleen wrote:

SNIP

> > 
> > > The only real fix would be probably to add some unique 
> > > prefix for BPF, but that would break all existing users.
> > 
> > 
> > yea, there was no response from bpf folks, but it's  probably not an optio
> > 
> > how about checking if the file exist like below..
> 
> I presume that would interact badly with good error messages for typos
> for file names.

it'd misplaced them for event names.. maybe not big deal

jirka