From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756354AbdJJJdx (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Oct 2017 05:33:53 -0400 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.101.70]:40902 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755349AbdJJJdv (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Oct 2017 05:33:51 -0400 Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2017 10:32:18 +0100 From: Mark Rutland To: Michael Ellerman Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Paul Mackerras , Shuah Khan Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/13] selftests/powerpc: kill off ACCESS_ONCE() Message-ID: <20171010093218.GD27659@leverpostej> References: <1507573730-8083-1-git-send-email-mark.rutland@arm.com> <1507573730-8083-12-git-send-email-mark.rutland@arm.com> <87mv4zygof.fsf@concordia.ellerman.id.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87mv4zygof.fsf@concordia.ellerman.id.au> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 11:45:04AM +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote: > Mark Rutland writes: > > > For several reasons, it is desirable to use {READ,WRITE}_ONCE() in > > preference to ACCESS_ONCE(), and new code is expected to use one of the > > former. So far, there's been no reason to change most existing uses of > > ACCESS_ONCE(), as these aren't currently harmful. > > > > However, for some features it is necessary to instrument reads and > > writes separately, which is not possible with ACCESS_ONCE(). This > > distinction is critical to correct operation. > > > > The bulk of the kernel code can be transformed via Coccinelle to use > > {READ,WRITE}_ONCE(), though this only modifies users of ACCESS_ONCE(), > > and not the implementation itself. As such, it has the potential to > > break homebrew ACCESS_ONCE() macros seen in some user code in the kernel > > tree (e.g. the virtio code, as fixed in commit ea9156fb3b71d9f7). > > > > To avoid fragility if/when that transformation occurs, and to align with > > the preferred usage of {READ,WRITE}_ONCE(), this patch updates the DSCR > > selftest code to use READ_ONCE() rather than ACCESS_ONCE(). There should > > be no functional change as a result of this patch. > > > > Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland > > Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt > > Cc: Michael Ellerman > > Cc: Paul Mackerras > > Cc: Shuah Khan > > --- > > tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/dscr/dscr.h | 2 +- > > tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/dscr/dscr_default_test.c | 2 +- > > 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > Acked-by: Michael Ellerman Thanks! Mark.