From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@kernel.org,
torvalds@linux-foundation.org, mark.rutland@arm.com,
linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org,
will.deacon@arm.com, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
Alexander Kuleshov <kuleshovmail@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 12/15] lib/assoc_array: Remove smp_read_barrier_depends()
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2017 08:52:37 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171010155237.GE3521@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8368.1507629579@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 10:59:39AM +0100, David Howells wrote:
> David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> > Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> >
> > > static inline void *assoc_array_ptr_to_leaf(const struct assoc_array_ptr *x)
> > > {
> > > - return (void *)((unsigned long)x & ~ASSOC_ARRAY_PTR_TYPE_MASK);
> > > + return (void *)((unsigned long)READ_ONCE(x) & /* Address dependency. */
> > > + ~ASSOC_ARRAY_PTR_TYPE_MASK);
> > > }
> >
> > This is the wrong place to do this. assoc_array_ptr_to_leaf() is effectively
> > no more than a special cast; it removes a metadata bit from a pointer. x is
> > the value we're modifying, not *x, and x was read by the caller.
>
> Also, x is not a pointer you can read from, so if READ_ONCE(x) ever effects a
> memory access, you might get an oops.
Agreed, and I got rid of it.
And thank you for looking this over!
And the patch again below, but this time also updating the commit log.
Thanx, Paul
------------------------------------------------------------------------
commit 472850f320e8eb47cfb06420c128c3f2bb8ccf27
Author: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Mon Oct 9 11:39:57 2017 -0700
lib/assoc_array: Remove smp_read_barrier_depends()
Now that smp_read_barrier_depends() is implied by READ_ONCE(), the several
smp_read_barrier_depends() calls may be removed from lib/assoc_array.c.
This commit makes this change and marks the READ_ONCE() calls that head
address dependencies.
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Alexander Kuleshov <kuleshovmail@gmail.com>
diff --git a/lib/assoc_array.c b/lib/assoc_array.c
index fe7953aead82..7e483294f7d7 100644
--- a/lib/assoc_array.c
+++ b/lib/assoc_array.c
@@ -38,12 +38,10 @@ static int assoc_array_subtree_iterate(const struct assoc_array_ptr *root,
if (assoc_array_ptr_is_shortcut(cursor)) {
/* Descend through a shortcut */
shortcut = assoc_array_ptr_to_shortcut(cursor);
- smp_read_barrier_depends();
- cursor = READ_ONCE(shortcut->next_node);
+ cursor = READ_ONCE(shortcut->next_node); /* Address dependency. */
}
node = assoc_array_ptr_to_node(cursor);
- smp_read_barrier_depends();
slot = 0;
/* We perform two passes of each node.
@@ -55,15 +53,12 @@ static int assoc_array_subtree_iterate(const struct assoc_array_ptr *root,
*/
has_meta = 0;
for (; slot < ASSOC_ARRAY_FAN_OUT; slot++) {
- ptr = READ_ONCE(node->slots[slot]);
+ ptr = READ_ONCE(node->slots[slot]); /* Address dependency. */
has_meta |= (unsigned long)ptr;
if (ptr && assoc_array_ptr_is_leaf(ptr)) {
- /* We need a barrier between the read of the pointer
- * and dereferencing the pointer - but only if we are
- * actually going to dereference it.
+ /* We need a barrier between the read of the pointer,
+ * which is supplied by the above READ_ONCE().
*/
- smp_read_barrier_depends();
-
/* Invoke the callback */
ret = iterator(assoc_array_ptr_to_leaf(ptr),
iterator_data);
@@ -86,10 +81,8 @@ static int assoc_array_subtree_iterate(const struct assoc_array_ptr *root,
continue_node:
node = assoc_array_ptr_to_node(cursor);
- smp_read_barrier_depends();
-
for (; slot < ASSOC_ARRAY_FAN_OUT; slot++) {
- ptr = READ_ONCE(node->slots[slot]);
+ ptr = READ_ONCE(node->slots[slot]); /* Address dependency. */
if (assoc_array_ptr_is_meta(ptr)) {
cursor = ptr;
goto begin_node;
@@ -98,16 +91,15 @@ static int assoc_array_subtree_iterate(const struct assoc_array_ptr *root,
finished_node:
/* Move up to the parent (may need to skip back over a shortcut) */
- parent = READ_ONCE(node->back_pointer);
+ parent = READ_ONCE(node->back_pointer); /* Address dependency. */
slot = node->parent_slot;
if (parent == stop)
return 0;
if (assoc_array_ptr_is_shortcut(parent)) {
shortcut = assoc_array_ptr_to_shortcut(parent);
- smp_read_barrier_depends();
cursor = parent;
- parent = READ_ONCE(shortcut->back_pointer);
+ parent = READ_ONCE(shortcut->back_pointer); /* Address dependency. */
slot = shortcut->parent_slot;
if (parent == stop)
return 0;
@@ -147,7 +139,7 @@ int assoc_array_iterate(const struct assoc_array *array,
void *iterator_data),
void *iterator_data)
{
- struct assoc_array_ptr *root = READ_ONCE(array->root);
+ struct assoc_array_ptr *root = READ_ONCE(array->root); /* Address dependency. */
if (!root)
return 0;
@@ -194,7 +186,7 @@ assoc_array_walk(const struct assoc_array *array,
pr_devel("-->%s()\n", __func__);
- cursor = READ_ONCE(array->root);
+ cursor = READ_ONCE(array->root); /* Address dependency. */
if (!cursor)
return assoc_array_walk_tree_empty;
@@ -216,11 +208,9 @@ assoc_array_walk(const struct assoc_array *array,
consider_node:
node = assoc_array_ptr_to_node(cursor);
- smp_read_barrier_depends();
-
slot = segments >> (level & ASSOC_ARRAY_KEY_CHUNK_MASK);
slot &= ASSOC_ARRAY_FAN_MASK;
- ptr = READ_ONCE(node->slots[slot]);
+ ptr = READ_ONCE(node->slots[slot]); /* Address dependency. */
pr_devel("consider slot %x [ix=%d type=%lu]\n",
slot, level, (unsigned long)ptr & 3);
@@ -254,7 +244,6 @@ assoc_array_walk(const struct assoc_array *array,
cursor = ptr;
follow_shortcut:
shortcut = assoc_array_ptr_to_shortcut(cursor);
- smp_read_barrier_depends();
pr_devel("shortcut to %d\n", shortcut->skip_to_level);
sc_level = level + ASSOC_ARRAY_LEVEL_STEP;
BUG_ON(sc_level > shortcut->skip_to_level);
@@ -294,7 +283,7 @@ assoc_array_walk(const struct assoc_array *array,
} while (sc_level < shortcut->skip_to_level);
/* The shortcut matches the leaf's index to this point. */
- cursor = READ_ONCE(shortcut->next_node);
+ cursor = READ_ONCE(shortcut->next_node); /* Address dependency. */
if (((level ^ sc_level) & ~ASSOC_ARRAY_KEY_CHUNK_MASK) != 0) {
level = sc_level;
goto jumped;
@@ -330,21 +319,19 @@ void *assoc_array_find(const struct assoc_array *array,
assoc_array_walk_found_terminal_node)
return NULL;
- node = result.terminal_node.node;
- smp_read_barrier_depends();
+ node = READ_ONCE(result.terminal_node.node); /* Address dependency. */
/* If the target key is available to us, it's has to be pointed to by
* the terminal node.
*/
for (slot = 0; slot < ASSOC_ARRAY_FAN_OUT; slot++) {
- ptr = READ_ONCE(node->slots[slot]);
+ ptr = READ_ONCE(node->slots[slot]); /* Address dependency. */
if (ptr && assoc_array_ptr_is_leaf(ptr)) {
/* We need a barrier between the read of the pointer
* and dereferencing the pointer - but only if we are
* actually going to dereference it.
*/
leaf = assoc_array_ptr_to_leaf(ptr);
- smp_read_barrier_depends();
if (ops->compare_object(leaf, index_key))
return (void *)leaf;
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-10-10 15:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 61+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-10-10 0:19 [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 0/15] Remove to-be-unneeded smp_read_barrier_depends() Paul E. McKenney
2017-10-10 0:22 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 01/15] doc: READ_ONCE() now implies smp_barrier_depends() Paul E. McKenney
2017-10-10 0:22 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 02/15] mn10300: READ_ONCE() now implies smp_read_barrier_depends() Paul E. McKenney
2017-10-10 0:22 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 03/15] drivers/net/ethernet/qlogic/qed: Fix __qed_spq_block() ordering Paul E. McKenney
2017-10-10 0:22 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 04/15] fs/dcache: Use release-acquire for name/length update Paul E. McKenney
2017-10-10 0:22 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 05/15] percpu: READ_ONCE() now implies smp_read_barrier_depends() Paul E. McKenney
2017-10-10 14:08 ` Tejun Heo
2017-10-10 15:30 ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-10-10 15:49 ` Tejun Heo
2017-10-10 0:22 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 06/15] rcu: Adjust read-side accessor comments for READ_ONCE() Paul E. McKenney
2017-10-10 0:22 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 07/15] rtnetlink: Update now-misleading smp_read_barrier_depends() comment Paul E. McKenney
2017-10-10 0:22 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 08/15] seqlock: Remove now-redundant smp_read_barrier_depends() Paul E. McKenney
2017-10-10 0:22 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 09/15] uprobes: " Paul E. McKenney
2017-10-10 0:22 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 10/15] locking: Remove smp_read_barrier_depends() from queued_spin_lock_slowpath() Paul E. McKenney
2017-10-10 0:22 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 11/15] tracepoint: Remove smp_read_barrier_depends() from comment Paul E. McKenney
2017-10-10 0:31 ` Steven Rostedt
2017-10-10 1:12 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2017-10-10 15:32 ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-10-10 0:22 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 12/15] lib/assoc_array: Remove smp_read_barrier_depends() Paul E. McKenney
2017-10-10 8:39 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-10-10 9:36 ` David Howells
2017-10-10 0:22 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 13/15] mm/ksm: Remove now-redundant smp_read_barrier_depends() Paul E. McKenney
2017-10-10 0:22 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 14/15] netfilter: " Paul E. McKenney
2017-10-10 8:43 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-10-10 15:56 ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-10-10 0:22 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 15/15] keyring: " Paul E. McKenney
2017-10-10 9:35 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 12/15] lib/assoc_array: Remove smp_read_barrier_depends() David Howells
2017-10-10 15:50 ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-10-10 15:54 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-10-10 16:05 ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-10-11 12:19 ` David Howells
2017-10-11 12:22 ` Will Deacon
2017-10-11 12:54 ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-10-11 14:18 ` Will Deacon
2017-10-11 14:50 ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-10-11 12:58 ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-10-11 15:17 ` David Howells
2017-10-11 15:59 ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-10-11 16:12 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-10-11 16:24 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-10-11 16:47 ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-10-11 16:54 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-10-11 17:06 ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-10-11 17:11 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-10-11 17:34 ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-10-11 18:43 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2017-10-11 18:56 ` Linus Torvalds
2017-10-11 19:28 ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-10-11 19:59 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2017-10-11 17:14 ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-10-11 17:19 ` Mark Rutland
2017-10-11 16:50 ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-10-11 16:07 ` David Howells
2017-10-11 16:17 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-10-11 16:19 ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-10-11 15:28 ` David Howells
2017-10-11 16:02 ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-10-10 9:59 ` David Howells
2017-10-10 15:52 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2017-10-11 12:21 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 0/15] Remove to-be-unneeded smp_read_barrier_depends() David Howells
2017-10-11 12:56 ` Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20171010155237.GE3521@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=kuleshovmail@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).