From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1753404AbdJLNGc (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Thu, 12 Oct 2017 09:06:32 -0400
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:49942 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com"
        rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
        id S1751210AbdJLNGa (ORCPT <rfc822;Linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Thu, 12 Oct 2017 09:06:30 -0400
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mx1.redhat.com 81136C2D0D4A
Authentication-Results: ext-mx08.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com
Authentication-Results: ext-mx08.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; spf=fail smtp.mailfrom=jolsa@redhat.com
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2017 15:06:27 +0200
From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
To: "Jin, Yao" <yao.jin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: acme@kernel.org, jolsa@kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org,
        mingo@redhat.com, alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com,
        Linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ak@linux.intel.com, kan.liang@intel.com,
        yao.jin@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf stat: Support metrics with perf stat --per-thread
Message-ID: <20171012130627.GA11016@krava>
References: <1507799100-2667-1-git-send-email-yao.jin@linux.intel.com>
 <20171012113019.GA4872@krava>
 <002d04ce-72a5-4a8f-30c2-ec1bcfd08358@linux.intel.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <002d04ce-72a5-4a8f-30c2-ec1bcfd08358@linux.intel.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.1 (2017-09-22)
X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.32]); Thu, 12 Oct 2017 13:06:30 +0000 (UTC)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 08:13:02PM +0800, Jin, Yao wrote:
> > 
> > I wonder if patch below would be enough for this
> > 
> > jirka
> > 
> > 
> 
> Hi Jiri,
> 
> I think below patch and next patch (in your another mail) is OK, thanks!
> 
> Do I need to upgrade my patch to v2 according to your modifications?
> 
> Or you will post your patches? Both OK for me. :)

I can post it later this week with my other fixes

jirka