public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Liang Chen <liangchen.linux@gmail.com>
To: linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org
Cc: mlyle@lyle.org, i@coly.li, kent.overstreet@gmail.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Liang Chen <liangchen.linux@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH] bcache: safeguard a dangerous addressing in closure_queue
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2017 22:37:37 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171012143737.24577-1-liangchen.linux@gmail.com> (raw)

The use of the union reduces the size of closure struct by taking advantage
of the current size of its members. The offset of func in work_struct equals
the size of the first three members, so that work.work_func will just
reference the forth member - fn.

This is smart but dangerous. It can be broken if work_struct or the other
structs get changed, and can be a bit difficult to debug.

Signed-off-by: Liang Chen <liangchen.linux@gmail.com>
---
Replacing all occurences of closure_fn to work_func_fn seems to be an option
but that would end up with a big lenghty and error prone patch.

 drivers/md/bcache/closure.h | 5 +++++
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/md/bcache/closure.h b/drivers/md/bcache/closure.h
index 295b7e4..dbff8f4 100644
--- a/drivers/md/bcache/closure.h
+++ b/drivers/md/bcache/closure.h
@@ -251,6 +251,11 @@ static inline void set_closure_fn(struct closure *cl, closure_fn *fn,
 static inline void closure_queue(struct closure *cl)
 {
 	struct workqueue_struct *wq = cl->wq;
+	/**
+	 * Changes made to closure, work_struct, or a couple of other structs
+	 * may cause work.func not pointing to the right location.
+	 */
+	BUG_ON((unsigned long)cl->fn != (unsigned long)cl->work.func);
 	if (wq) {
 		INIT_WORK(&cl->work, cl->work.func);
 		BUG_ON(!queue_work(wq, &cl->work));
-- 
1.8.3.1

             reply	other threads:[~2017-10-12 14:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-10-12 14:37 Liang Chen [this message]
2017-10-12 17:44 ` [PATCH] bcache: safeguard a dangerous addressing in closure_queue Michael Lyle
2017-10-13  5:02   ` Liang Chen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20171012143737.24577-1-liangchen.linux@gmail.com \
    --to=liangchen.linux@gmail.com \
    --cc=i@coly.li \
    --cc=kent.overstreet@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mlyle@lyle.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox