From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753306AbdJLP4t (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Oct 2017 11:56:49 -0400 Received: from merlin.infradead.org ([205.233.59.134]:43518 "EHLO merlin.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751040AbdJLP4s (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Oct 2017 11:56:48 -0400 Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2017 17:56:35 +0200 From: Peter Zijlstra To: Tejun Heo Cc: Byungchul Park , johannes.berg@intel.com, mingo@kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de, oleg@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@lge.com Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH v2 2/2] lockdep: Remove unnecessary acquisitions wrt workqueue flush Message-ID: <20171012155635.ntljsbmtq4mstb2f@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> References: <1507618297-27470-1-git-send-email-byungchul.park@lge.com> <1507618297-27470-2-git-send-email-byungchul.park@lge.com> <20171012075435.GK3323@X58A-UD3R> <20171012153817.GQ3301751@devbig577.frc2.facebook.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20171012153817.GQ3301751@devbig577.frc2.facebook.com> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170609 (1.8.3) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 08:38:17AM -0700, Tejun Heo wrote: > > As long as we have the same level of protection, simpler code is of > course preferable. That said, I haven't followed the discussion > closely and don't want to apply it without Peter's ack. Peter? I'm really tied up atm; and feel we should be addressing the false positives generated by the current code before we start doing new stuff on top.