From: Rakib Mullick <rakib.mullick@gmail.com>
To: peterz@infradead.org, mingo@kernel.org
Cc: mka@chromium.org, longman@redhat.com, adobriyan@gmail.com,
tglx@linutronix.de, akpm@linux-foundation.org, tj@kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] Fix isocpus's param handling when CPUMASK_OFFSTACK=n.
Date: Sun, 15 Oct 2017 19:18:20 +0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171015131820.7173-1-rakib.mullick@gmail.com> (raw)
cpulist_parse() uses nr_cpumask_bits as limit to parse the
passed buffer from kernel commandline. What nr_cpumask_bits
represents varies depends upon CONFIG_CPUMASK_OFFSTACK option.
If CONFIG_CPUMASK_OFFSTACK=n, then nr_cpumask_bits is same as
NR_CPUS, which might not represent the # of cpus really exist
(default 64). So, there's a chance of gap between nr_cpu_ids
and NR_CPUS, which ultimately lead towards invalid cpulist_parse()
operation. For example, if isolcpus=9 is passed on a 8 cpu
system (CONFIG_CPUMASK_OFFSTACK=n) it doesn't show the error
that it suppose to.
This patch fixes this issue by effectively find out the last
cpu of the passed isolcpus list and checking it with nr_cpu_ids.
Also, fixes the error message where the nr_cpu_ids should be
nr_cpu_ids-1, since the cpu numbering starts from 0.
Signed-off-by: Rakib Mullick <rakib.mullick@gmail.com>
---
include/linux/cpumask.h | 16 ++++++++++++++++
kernel/sched/topology.c | 8 +++++---
2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/cpumask.h b/include/linux/cpumask.h
index 2404ad2..f9a7c9b 100644
--- a/include/linux/cpumask.h
+++ b/include/linux/cpumask.h
@@ -130,6 +130,11 @@ static inline unsigned int cpumask_first(const struct cpumask *srcp)
return 0;
}
+static inline unsigned int cpumask_last(const struct cpumask *srcp)
+{
+ return 0;
+}
+
/* Valid inputs for n are -1 and 0. */
static inline unsigned int cpumask_next(int n, const struct cpumask *srcp)
{
@@ -179,6 +184,17 @@ static inline unsigned int cpumask_first(const struct cpumask *srcp)
}
/**
+ * cpumask_last - get the last cpu in a cpumask
+ * @srcp: - the cpumask pointer
+ *
+ * Returns >= nr_cpumask_bits if no cpus set.
+ */
+static inline unsigned int cpumask_last(const struct cpumask *srcp)
+{
+ return find_last_bit(cpumask_bits(srcp), nr_cpumask_bits);
+}
+
+/**
* cpumask_next - get the next cpu in a cpumask
* @n: the cpu prior to the place to search (ie. return will be > @n)
* @srcp: the cpumask pointer
diff --git a/kernel/sched/topology.c b/kernel/sched/topology.c
index 1b0b4fb..55b5e09 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/topology.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/topology.c
@@ -452,12 +452,14 @@ cpu_attach_domain(struct sched_domain *sd, struct root_domain *rd, int cpu)
/* Setup the mask of CPUs configured for isolated domains */
static int __init isolated_cpu_setup(char *str)
{
- int ret;
+ int ret, lastcpu;
alloc_bootmem_cpumask_var(&cpu_isolated_map);
ret = cpulist_parse(str, cpu_isolated_map);
- if (ret) {
- pr_err("sched: Error, all isolcpus= values must be between 0 and %d\n", nr_cpu_ids);
+ lastcpu = cpumask_last(cpu_isolated_map);
+ if (ret || lastcpu >= nr_cpu_ids) {
+ pr_err("sched: Error, all isolcpus= values must be between 0 and %d\n",
+ nr_cpu_ids-1);
return 0;
}
return 1;
--
2.9.3
next reply other threads:[~2017-10-15 13:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-10-15 13:18 Rakib Mullick [this message]
2017-10-20 8:49 ` [PATCH] Fix isocpus's param handling when CPUMASK_OFFSTACK=n Ingo Molnar
2017-10-21 7:10 ` Rakib Mullick
2017-10-23 11:50 ` Ingo Molnar
2017-10-23 13:01 ` Rakib Mullick
2017-10-24 10:17 ` [tip:sched/core] sched/isolcpus: Fix "isolcpus=" boot parameter handling when !CONFIG_CPUMASK_OFFSTACK tip-bot for Rakib Mullick
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20171015131820.7173-1-rakib.mullick@gmail.com \
--to=rakib.mullick@gmail.com \
--cc=adobriyan@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=longman@redhat.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=mka@chromium.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).