From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752079AbdJPJa4 (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Oct 2017 05:30:56 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:50516 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751999AbdJPJay (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Oct 2017 05:30:54 -0400 DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mx1.redhat.com 13EDD7E428 Authentication-Results: ext-mx03.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: ext-mx03.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; spf=fail smtp.mailfrom=jolsa@redhat.com Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2017 11:30:51 +0200 From: Jiri Olsa To: "Du, Changbin" Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , peterz@infradead.org, mingo@redhat.com, alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jolsa@kernel.org Subject: Re: Does perf-annotate work correctly? Message-ID: <20171016093051.GB31858@krava> References: <20170912101035.GA21638@intel.com> <20170912143350.GA3452@kernel.org> <20170913091408.GA9625@intel.com> <20171013101500.GA29995@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20171013101500.GA29995@intel.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.1 (2017-09-22) X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.27]); Mon, 16 Oct 2017 09:30:54 +0000 (UTC) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 06:15:00PM +0800, Du, Changbin wrote: > Hi Jiri, > Sorry, missed you (but get_maintainer.pl doesn't list you). Here is ealier email. > https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/9/12/158 > > Do you think if this is a real issue? > > btw, is their a dedicated mailist for perf? Thanks. there's linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org for perf specific issues jirka