From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753095AbdJPOTt (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Oct 2017 10:19:49 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:33664 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753032AbdJPOTq (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Oct 2017 10:19:46 -0400 DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mx1.redhat.com 770AB155E0 Authentication-Results: ext-mx05.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: ext-mx05.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; spf=fail smtp.mailfrom=acme@redhat.com Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2017 12:19:43 -0200 From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo To: ravi Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Milian Wolff , Jiri Olsa , Jin Yao , Linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, David Ahern , Namhyung Kim , Peter Zijlstra Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 11/16] perf report: properly handle branch count in match_chain Message-ID: <20171016141943.GC2567@redhat.com> References: <20171009203310.17362-1-milian.wolff@kdab.com> <20171009203310.17362-12-milian.wolff@kdab.com> <20171013133903.GN3503@kernel.org> <20171013140834.GO3503@kernel.org> <5f4372e7-8e75-bf34-3947-4b38036241a4@linux.vnet.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5f4372e7-8e75-bf34-3947-4b38036241a4@linux.vnet.ibm.com> X-Url: http://acmel.wordpress.com User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-12-10) X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.29]); Mon, 16 Oct 2017 14:19:46 +0000 (UTC) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Em Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 09:48:17AM +0530, ravi escreveu: > > On Friday 13 October 2017 07:38 PM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > >Em Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 10:39:03AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu: > >>Em Mon, Oct 09, 2017 at 10:33:05PM +0200, Milian Wolff escreveu: > >>>Some of the code paths I introduced before returned too early > >>>without running the code to handle a node's branch count. > >>>By refactoring match_chain to only have one exit point, this > >>>can be remedied. > >>Fixing up this one now. > >Millian, this is all fresher in your mind, can you please take a look at > >my perf/core branch and check if the change i made to ]PATCH v5 09/16] > >"perf report: compare symbol name for inlined frames when matching" is > >ok wrt Ravi's fix and then, please, rebase v5 on top of what is there? > > > >Ravi, please take a look at this as well, to see if with these changes > >your fix remains valid, ok? > > Yes Arnaldo, my changes are still valid. I knot they are valid, probably my wording was unclear, I was asking if, with Milian changes, and my fixing up to cope with your patch, that was just in perf/urgent, while Milian work was done on perf/core, everything worked for your use case. - Arnaldo > Milian, Can you please change this patch such that it incorporates dso > comparison for CCKEY_FUNCTION. > > ( Also, will that be good to change macro to CCKEY_FUNCTION_DOS ?) > > Thanks, > Ravi