From: "Pali Rohár" <pali.rohar@gmail.com>
To: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@dell.com>
Cc: dvhart@infradead.org, Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
quasisec@google.com, rjw@rjwysocki.net, mjg59@google.com,
hch@lst.de, Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>,
Alan Cox <gnomes@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 05/17] platform/x86: dell-wmi-descriptor: split WMI descriptor into it's own driver
Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2017 20:59:12 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171017185912.uys7e7embiv4g3ii@pali> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <892677197340c05a67e112884cc00ea938d33e91.1508259916.git.mario.limonciello@dell.com>
On Tuesday 17 October 2017 13:21:49 Mario Limonciello wrote:
> +struct descriptor_priv {
> + struct list_head list;
> + u32 interface_version;
> + u32 size;
> +};
> +static LIST_HEAD(wmi_list);
> +
> +bool dell_wmi_get_interface_version(u32 *version)
> +{
> + struct descriptor_priv *priv;
> +
> + priv = list_first_entry_or_null(&wmi_list,
> + struct descriptor_priv,
> + list);
> + if (!priv)
> + return false;
> + *version = priv->interface_version;
There is a race condition. dell_wmi_descriptor_remove can be called
between list_first_entry_or_null and dereferencing priv pointer.
> + return true;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dell_wmi_get_interface_version);
> +
> +bool dell_wmi_get_size(u32 *size)
> +{
> + struct descriptor_priv *priv;
> +
> + priv = list_first_entry_or_null(&wmi_list,
> + struct descriptor_priv,
> + list);
> + if (!priv)
> + return false;
> + *size = priv->size;
And same there.
> + return true;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dell_wmi_get_size);
...
> @@ -733,9 +659,8 @@ static int dell_wmi_probe(struct wmi_device *wdev)
> return -ENOMEM;
> dev_set_drvdata(&wdev->dev, priv);
>
> - err = dell_wmi_check_descriptor_buffer(wdev);
> - if (err)
> - return err;
> + if (!dell_wmi_get_interface_version(&priv->interface_version))
> + return -EPROBE_DEFER;
This could lead to another problem, when Dell decide to change WMI API
and would not provide descriptor WMI GUID anymore, but still provide
even WMI GUID.
Basically it is needed to distinguish between states:
1) probe function of dell-wmi was called before probe function of
dell-wmi-descriptor device initialization
2) probe function of dell-wmi was called, but there is no device
instance of dell-wmi-descriptor
3) there is a device instance of dell-wmi-descriptor, but device is not
registered to dell-wmi-descriptor driver, e.g. because userspace
decided to forbid such thing, or because probing of
dell-wmi-descriptor device failed
4) probe function of dell-wmi was called after probe function of
dell-wmi-descriptor successfully
I do not know how to handle such situation other drivers or how to do it
correctly. I just wanted to show the fact that binding device <-->
driver can fail in linux kernel (for more reasons) and in some cases
repeating it does not make sense...
Maybe other developers would comment this part?
>
> return dell_wmi_input_setup(wdev);
> }
--
Pali Rohár
pali.rohar@gmail.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-10-17 18:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-10-17 18:21 [PATCH v9 00/17] Introduce support for Dell SMBIOS over WMI Mario Limonciello
2017-10-17 18:21 ` [PATCH v9 01/17] platform/x86: wmi: Add new method wmidev_evaluate_method Mario Limonciello
2017-10-17 18:41 ` Pali Rohár
2017-10-17 18:21 ` [PATCH v9 02/17] platform/x86: dell-wmi: increase severity of some failures Mario Limonciello
2017-10-17 18:42 ` Pali Rohár
2017-10-17 18:21 ` [PATCH v9 03/17] platform/x86: dell-wmi: clean up wmi descriptor check Mario Limonciello
2017-10-17 18:44 ` Pali Rohár
2017-10-17 19:31 ` Mario.Limonciello
2017-10-17 18:21 ` [PATCH v9 04/17] platform/x86: dell-wmi: allow 32k return size in the descriptor Mario Limonciello
2017-10-17 18:46 ` Pali Rohár
2017-10-17 18:56 ` Mario.Limonciello
2017-10-17 18:21 ` [PATCH v9 05/17] platform/x86: dell-wmi-descriptor: split WMI descriptor into it's own driver Mario Limonciello
2017-10-17 18:59 ` Pali Rohár [this message]
2017-10-17 20:22 ` Mario.Limonciello
2017-10-17 18:21 ` [PATCH v9 06/17] platform/x86: wmi: Don't allow drivers to get each other's GUIDs Mario Limonciello
2017-10-17 19:00 ` Pali Rohár
2017-10-17 18:21 ` [PATCH v9 07/17] platform/x86: dell-smbios: only run if proper oem string is detected Mario Limonciello
2017-10-17 19:03 ` Pali Rohár
2017-10-17 19:10 ` Mario.Limonciello
2017-10-17 19:19 ` Mario.Limonciello
2017-10-17 19:25 ` Pali Rohár
2017-10-17 19:29 ` Mario.Limonciello
2017-10-17 18:21 ` [PATCH v9 08/17] platform/x86: dell-smbios: Add a sysfs interface for SMBIOS tokens Mario Limonciello
2017-10-17 18:21 ` [PATCH v9 09/17] platform/x86: dell-smbios: Introduce dispatcher for SMM calls Mario Limonciello
2017-10-17 18:21 ` [PATCH v9 10/17] platform/x86: dell-smbios-wmi: Add new WMI dispatcher driver Mario Limonciello
2017-10-17 19:10 ` Pali Rohár
2017-10-17 18:21 ` [PATCH v9 11/17] platform/x86: dell-smbios-smm: test for WSMT Mario Limonciello
2017-10-17 19:22 ` Pali Rohár
2017-10-18 19:09 ` Darren Hart
2017-10-18 19:10 ` Mario.Limonciello
2017-10-17 18:21 ` [PATCH v9 12/17] platform/x86: dell-smbios: Add filtering support Mario Limonciello
2017-10-17 18:21 ` [PATCH v9 13/17] platform/x86: wmi: Add sysfs attribute for required_buffer_size Mario Limonciello
2017-10-17 18:21 ` [PATCH v9 14/17] platform/x86: wmi: create userspace interface for drivers Mario Limonciello
2017-10-17 18:21 ` [PATCH v9 15/17] platform/x86: dell-smbios-wmi: introduce userspace interface Mario Limonciello
2017-10-17 18:22 ` [PATCH v9 16/17] platform/x86: shuffle headers to export for userspace Mario Limonciello
2017-10-17 18:22 ` [PATCH v9 17/17] tools/wmi: add a sample for dell smbios communication over WMI Mario Limonciello
2017-10-18 2:33 ` Edward O'Callaghan
2017-10-18 7:29 ` Pali Rohár
2017-10-18 13:55 ` Mario.Limonciello
2017-10-18 22:27 ` Mario.Limonciello
2017-10-19 3:12 ` Edward O'Callaghan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20171017185912.uys7e7embiv4g3ii@pali \
--to=pali.rohar@gmail.com \
--cc=andy.shevchenko@gmail.com \
--cc=dvhart@infradead.org \
--cc=gnomes@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mario.limonciello@dell.com \
--cc=mjg59@google.com \
--cc=platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=quasisec@google.com \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox